Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Risk governance through professional expertise: forestry consultants’ handling of uncertainties after a storm disaster
Örebro University, School of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences. (Centrum för urbana och regionala studier)ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6735-0011
Örebro University, School of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6522-6025
2016 (English)In: Journal of Risk Research, ISSN 1366-9877, E-ISSN 1466-4461, Vol. 19, no 10, 1275-1290 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

How do forestry consultants provide advice when facing a situation of great uncertainty? This question serves as the point of departure in analyzing how forestry consultants provide guidance in extreme situations. Three empirical cases are analyzed, all related to a storm that caused the most severe damage in Swedish history. The first case concerns how forestry consultants handled the immediate uncertainties in their advice on how to manage the windthrow. The second case concerns how they handled the risks associated with the large-scale timber depots that resulted from the decision to transport all windthrown trees away from the forest. The third case concerns how forestry consultants handled uncertainties regarding the reforestation of the area. Whereas there was discursive closure in the two first cases, and the forest owners followed the recommendations made by the forestry consultants, there was no discursive closure in the third case, resulting in the forest owners deciding against the advice provided by the consultants. In conclusion, this result is explained with reference to the epistemic authority and embodied knowledge of the forestry consultants.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Taylor & Francis, 2016. Vol. 19, no 10, 1275-1290 p.
Keyword [en]
risk governance, uncertainty, forestry consultants, storms, climate change
National Category
Sociology (excluding Social Work, Social Psychology and Social Anthropology)
Research subject
Sociology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-38762DOI: 10.1080/13669877.2015.1043570ISI: 000390681000006Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84929601020OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-38762DiVA: diva2:764477
Funder
Mistra - The Swedish Foundation for Strategic Environmental Research
Note

Funding Agencies:

Forestry Research Institute of Sweden (Skogforsk)

Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU)

Umeå University

Available from: 2014-11-19 Created: 2014-11-19 Last updated: 2017-12-05Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

Fulltext(234 kB)150 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 234 kBChecksum SHA-512
8d38fb3edb0bba26484ef85e321a0eef37cd9fd6d871d3a7fc2efdd89d31f436579a8f2108de57b1bad74744a406b85bb15e52424a4f55267934a268c760e333
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Lidskog, RolfSjödin, Daniel
By organisation
School of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences
In the same journal
Journal of Risk Research
Sociology (excluding Social Work, Social Psychology and Social Anthropology)

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 150 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 632 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf