Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Free to stay, free to leave: insights from Poland into the meaning of cohabitation
Cardinal Stefan Wyszynski University, Warsaw, Polan.
Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Sociology. Institute of Statistics and Demography, Warsaw School of Economics.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3030-5716
Vienna Institute of Demography, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Austria .
2014 (English)In: Demographic Research, ISSN 1435-9871, Vol. 31, no 36, 1107-1136 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: Previous studies have shown that in Poland cohabitation is most of all a transitory step or a testing period before marriage. Polish law does not recognize this living arrangement and it has been portrayed as uncommitted and short-lived. However, few studies have investigated what cohabitation means for relationships, especially with respect to freedom.

Objective: We explore how young people in Poland understand and evaluate freedom in cohabitation. We investigate how they view the role freedom plays in couple dynamics and in relationship development.

Methods: We analyze data from focus group interviews conducted in Warsaw with men and women aged 25-40. We identify passages in which opinions on cohabitation and marriage are discussed, and use bottom-up coding and the constant comparative method to reconstruct different perspectives on the issue of freedom in cohabitation.

Results: The respondents argued that cohabitation offers the partners freedom to leave a union at any time with few repercussions. On the negative side, the freedom related to cohabitation brings insecurity, especially for young mothers. On the positive side, it offers relaxed conditions for testing a relationship, grants partners independence, and encourages cohabitors to keep their relationship interesting, precisely because it is fragile and easy to dissolve.

Conclusions: The open nature of cohabitation offers benefits to partners, but does not provide secure conditions for childbearing. As long as the couple is not planning to have children, however, the benefits of cohabitation are likely to be seen as outweighing the disadvantages.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Rostock: Max-Planck-Gesellschaft , 2014. Vol. 31, no 36, 1107-1136 p.
Keyword [en]
cohabitation, focus group interviews, freedom
National Category
Social and Economic Geography Sociology
Research subject
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-96249DOI: 10.4054/DemRes.2014.31.36ISI: 000345044700003OAI: diva2:763165
Available from: 2014-11-13 Created: 2014-11-13 Last updated: 2015-03-25Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(842 kB)146 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 842 kBChecksum SHA-512
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textDemographic Research

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Baranowska-Rataj, Anna
By organisation
Department of Sociology
In the same journal
Demographic Research
Social and Economic GeographySociology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 146 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 268 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link