Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Non-canonical case-marking on core arguments in Lithuanian: A historical and contrastive perspective
Stockholm University, Faculty of Humanities, Department of Baltic Languages, Finnish and German.
2014 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

This thesis presents a description and analysis of non-canonical case-marking of core arguments in Lithuanian. It consists of an introduction and six articles, providing historical and/or contrastive perspective to this issue. More specifically, using data from Lithuanian dialects, Old Lithuanian and other languages such as Icelandic, Latin and Finnic for comparison, the thesis examines the development and current state of non-canonical case-marking of core arguments in Lithuanian The present work draws on empirical findings and theoretical considerations to investigate non-canonical case-marking, language variation and historical linguistics.

Special attention is paid to the variation in the case-marking of body parts in pain verb constructions, where an accusative-marked body part is used in Standard Lithuanian, and alongside, a nominative-marked body part in Lithuanian dialects. A common objective of the first three articles is to clarify and to seek a better understanding for the reasons for this case variation. The research provides evidence that nominative is the original case-marking of body parts in pain specific construction, i.e. with verbs, with the original meaning of pain, like skaudėti and sopėti ‘hurt, feel pain’. On the contrary, in derived pain constructions, i.e. with verbs like gelti with the original meaning of ‘sting, bite’ and diegti with the original meaning ‘plant’, accusative is the original case-marking of body parts. This accusative is explained by means of an oblique anticausative and it is argued furthermore that it is extended into the pain specific construction. The three last articles focus on the comparative and contrastive perspective. Their main results include the following: Lithuanian and Icelandic differ considerably in the frequency of using accusative vs. dative marking on the highest ranked argument. Accusative is more frequently used in Lithuanian while dative is dominant in Icelandic. The semantic fields of the dative subject construction have remained very stable, suggesting that the dative subject construction is inherited. It has, however, become productive in the history of Germanic, Baltic and Slavic. The similarities in Finnic and Baltic partiality-based object and subject-marking systems are due to Baltic influence.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Stockholm: Acta Universitatis Stockholmiensis, 2014. , 94 p.
Series
Stockholm studies in Baltic languages, ISSN 0281-5478 ; 9
Keyword [en]
Case-marking, non-canonical subjects, core arguments, Lithuanian, Old Lithuanian, Lithuanian dialects, pain verbs, oblique anticausative, Icelandic, historical linguistics, contrastive linguistics, Construction grammar, Role and Reference grammar
National Category
Languages and Literature
Research subject
Baltic Languages
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-108978ISBN: 978-91-87235-75-7 (print)ISBN: 978-91-87235-76-4 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-108978DiVA: diva2:761906
Public defence
2014-12-12, hörsal 2, hus A, Universitetsvägen 10 A, Stockholm, 14:00 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Note

At the time of the doctoral defense, the following papers were unpublished and had a status as follows: Paper 1: In press. Paper 2: In press. Paper 3: In press.

Available from: 2014-11-20 Created: 2014-11-09 Last updated: 2016-12-30Bibliographically approved
List of papers
1. Dialectal and Diachronic Distribution of Case Variation in Lithuanian Pain Verb Construction
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Dialectal and Diachronic Distribution of Case Variation in Lithuanian Pain Verb Construction
(English)In: Baltic Linguistics, ISSN 2081-7533Article in journal (Refereed) In press
National Category
General Language Studies and Linguistics
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:su:diva-108412 (URN)
Available from: 2014-10-23 Created: 2014-10-23 Last updated: 2017-12-05
2. Emergence and spread of accusative marking of body parts in Lithuanian: Construction Grammar account
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Emergence and spread of accusative marking of body parts in Lithuanian: Construction Grammar account
(English)In: Baltu Filoloģija, ISSN 1691-0036Article in journal (Refereed) In press
National Category
General Language Studies and Linguistics
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:su:diva-108413 (URN)
Available from: 2014-10-23 Created: 2014-10-23 Last updated: 2014-11-10
3. Oblique anticausative in Lithuanian: A comparative approach
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Oblique anticausative in Lithuanian: A comparative approach
(English)In: Baltistica, ISSN 0132-6503, E-ISSN 2345-0045Article in journal (Refereed) In press
National Category
General Language Studies and Linguistics
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:su:diva-108414 (URN)
Available from: 2014-10-23 Created: 2014-10-23 Last updated: 2017-12-05
4. On the non-canonical marking of the highest-ranking argument in Lithuanian and Icelandic: Step towards a database
Open this publication in new window or tab >>On the non-canonical marking of the highest-ranking argument in Lithuanian and Icelandic: Step towards a database
2014 (English)In: Grammatical Relations and their Non-Canonical Encoding in Baltic / [ed] Axel Holvoet, Nicole Nau, John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2014, 301-361 p.Chapter in book (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

This paper is a first report on an ongoing project aiming at building up a database of non-canonical argument marking in Lithuanian in contrast to other languages with relatively rich systems of morphological cases. The language with which we begin the comparison is Icelandic. The overarching aim consists not only in a unified inventorisation of relevant units, but in disclosing (i) regularities in the alternation of coding patterns and (ii) the factors underlying such variation. We will concentrate on case marking; this however implies agreement patterns as well, insofar as in these two languages only nominatival NPs trigger agreement on the finite verb (= predicate of the clause). We further concentrate on verbs with non-canonical marking of their highest-ranking argument (HRA); the notion of HRA is defined on the basis of the Actor-Undergoer Hierarchy as developed in Role & Reference Grammar (see 2.1). What we present here is not yet a comprehensive description of the whole body of data, but rather a problem paper which details some conceptual issues and highlights some prominent types of argument coding and their relation to lexical groups.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2014
Series
Valency, Argument Realization and Grammatical Relations in Baltic, ISSN 2352-0159
National Category
General Language Studies and Linguistics
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:su:diva-108411 (URN)9789027259097 (ISBN)9789027270399 (ISBN)
Available from: 2014-10-23 Created: 2014-10-23 Last updated: 2016-09-13Bibliographically approved
5. Reconstructing constructional semantics: The dative subject construction in Old Norse-Icelandic, Latin, Ancient Greek, Old Russian and Old Lithuanian
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Reconstructing constructional semantics: The dative subject construction in Old Norse-Icelandic, Latin, Ancient Greek, Old Russian and Old Lithuanian
Show others...
2012 (English)In: Studies in Language, ISSN 0378-4177, E-ISSN 1569-9978, Vol. 36, no 3, 511-547 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

As the historical linguistic community is well aware, reconstructing semantics is a notoriously difficult undertaking. Such reconstruction has so far mostly been carried out on lexical items, like words and morphemes, and has not been conducted for larger and more complex linguistic units, which intuitively seems to be a more intricate task, especially given the lack of methodological criteria and guidelines within the field. This follows directly from the fact that most current theoretical frameworks are not construction-based, that is, they do not assume that constructions are form-meaning correspondences. In order to meet this challenge, we present an attempt at reconstructing constructional semantics, and more precisely the semantics of the Dative Subject Construction for an earlier stage of Indo-European. For this purpose we employ lexical semantic verb classes in combination with the semantic map model (Bar partial derivative dal 2007, Bar partial derivative dal, Kristoffersen & Sveen 2011), showing how incredibly stable semantic fields may remain across long time spans, and how reconstructing such semantic fields may be accomplished

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2012
National Category
General Language Studies and Linguistics
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:su:diva-108410 (URN)10.1075/sl.36.3.03bar (DOI)000312243800003 ()
Available from: 2014-10-22 Created: 2014-10-22 Last updated: 2017-12-05Bibliographically approved
6. Primary Argument Case-marking in Baltic and Finnic
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Primary Argument Case-marking in Baltic and Finnic
2013 (English)In: Baltu filologija, ISSN 1691-0036, Vol. XXII, no 1, 31-65 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Keyword
Baltic languages, Finnic, partiality based case-marking, genitive agent, language contact
National Category
General Language Studies and Linguistics
Research subject
Baltic Languages; Finno-Ugric Languages
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:su:diva-108408 (URN)
Available from: 2014-10-22 Created: 2014-10-22 Last updated: 2014-11-11Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1173 kB)347 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT02.pdfFile size 1173 kBChecksum SHA-512
ef172a97044c160a4c6d1f9c54fc1016fb990594cb0544962639e25f17ec36af36e4484e23e9f3177c562fbf616cc1015f843f3e264d7c493d1cabc3a6c6b3d1
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Bjarnadóttir, Valgerður
By organisation
Department of Baltic Languages, Finnish and German
Languages and Literature

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 347 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 533 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf