Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Behavioural and Physiological Effects of Finely Balanced Decision-Making in Chickens
School of Clinical Veterinary Science, University of Bristol, UK.
School of Clinical Veterinary Science, University of Bristol, UK.
Linköping University, Department of Physics, Chemistry and Biology, Biology. Linköping University, The Institute of Technology. (Avian Behavioural Genomics and Physiology Group)
School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, UK.
2014 (English)In: PLoS ONE, ISSN 1932-6203, Vol. 9, no 10, e108809- p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

In humans, more difficult decisions result in behavioural and physiological changes suggestive of increased arousal, butlittle is known about the effect of decision difficulty in other species. A difficult decision can have a number ofcharacteristics; we aimed to monitor how finely balanced decisions, compared to unbalanced ones, affected the behaviourand physiology of chickens. An unbalanced decision was one in which the two options were of unequal net value (1 (Q1) vs.6 (Q6) pieces of sweetcorn with no cost associated with either option); a finely balanced decision was one in which theoptions were of equal net value (i.e. hens were "indifferent" to both options). To identify hens’ indifference, a titrationprocedure was used in which a cost (electromagnetic weight on an access door) was applied to the Q6 option, to find theindividual point at which hens chose this option approximately equally to Q1 via a non-weighted door. We then comparedbehavioural and physiological indicators of arousal (head movements, latency to choose, heart-rate variability and surfacebody temperature) when chickens made decisions that were unbalanced or finely balanced. Significant physiological (heartratevariability) and behavioural (latency to pen) differences were found between the finely balanced and balancedconditions, but these were likely to be artefacts of the greater time and effort required to push through the weighted doors.No other behavioural and physiological measures were significantly different between the decision categories. We suggestthat more information is needed on when best to monitor likely changes in arousal during decision-making and that futurestudies should consider decisions defined as difficult in other ways.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Public Library of Science , 2014. Vol. 9, no 10, e108809- p.
National Category
Biological Sciences
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-111660DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0108809ISI: 000342591500033PubMedID: 25275440OAI: diva2:758736
Available from: 2014-10-28 Created: 2014-10-28 Last updated: 2015-03-02Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(7236 kB)39 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 7236 kBChecksum SHA-512
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Persson, Mia
By organisation
BiologyThe Institute of Technology
In the same journal
Biological Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 39 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 55 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link