Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
2D vs 3D in a touch-free hand gesture based interface: An exploration of how 2D and 3D visual aids affect a user’s ability to learn a new interface
Linnaeus University, Faculty of Technology, Department of Media Technology.
2014 (English)Independent thesis Basic level (degree of Bachelor), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

3D is a popular topic as an increasing amount of media and technology begin to support 3D interaction.  With the rise of interest in 3D interaction, the question of why there is a demand and desire for 3D over 2D interaction becomes relevant. This thesis compares the differences between a 3D heads up display and a 2D heads up display for a touch free gesture based virtual keyboard.  The gesture interface used in the tests is a way of communicating with a system using gestures of the hands tracked by a motion sensor.  This thesis tested 16 users where half of the users used a 2D version of a heads up display and the other half used a 3D version of a heads up display.  Both user groups were tested with identical conditions and in an identical environment.  Raw statistical data was gathered from a logging mechanism in the interface and qualitative data was gathered from questionnaires and observation notes.  The results from the experiment showed that the 2D and 3D heads up display gave very similar results. However, results also showed slightly better qualitative results from the 3D heads up display observation and questionnaire data.  The conclusion indicated no clear advantage for the 2D version or the 3D version.  The discussion shows that many other factors in the design process and selection of users, play a large role in the comparison of 2D vs 3D visualizations.  Factors such as age and familiarity with different levels of technology are indicated to be contributing factors when comparing 2D vs 3D.  The results and discussion hope to provide a starting point for future comparison research in the field of 2D compared to 3D visualization.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2014. , 50 p.
Keyword [en]
Gestures, 2D, 3D, Interfaces, Virtual Keyboards, Heads Up Display, HUD, Touch-Free
National Category
Interaction Technologies
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-37748OAI: oai:DiVA.org:lnu-37748DiVA: diva2:756980
External cooperation
Erghis Technologies AB
Subject / course
Media Technology
Educational program
Interactive Digital Media, 180 credits
Presentation
2014-06-05, Building D room 1136, 351 95, Växjö, 15:44 (English)
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2015-01-15 Created: 2014-10-20 Last updated: 2015-01-15Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

CS_Thesis(2780 kB)186 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 2780 kBChecksum SHA-512
ec924e27bb98a1ebd3884adc7782c45d0ebef5992592ae7ec312764a081dcece285d7f568977e20f226aa73122bc0342d3d2e83800de0e403529319d19aa51c1
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Shields, Christopher
By organisation
Department of Media Technology
Interaction Technologies

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 186 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 766 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf