Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Bra miljöval: En fallstudie av ett miljömärkes förtroendearbete
Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Stockholm Centre for Organizational Research (SCORE).
2014 (Swedish)Report (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

The present study examines the Swedish eco-label Good Environmental Choice (Bra Miljöval); an eco-label that has attained great recognition in Sweden since its initiation in 1989. The focus of the study is on the control function behind this particular label and how the criteria writing and control mechanism are organized. Good Environmental Choice is operated by the Swedish Society for Nature Conservation (Naturskyddsföreningen). One of the aspects that distinguish Good Environmental Choice from many other contemporary eco-labels, such as KRAV, FSC and Fairtrade, is that the control of compliance with the criteria is kept internally within the organization. The same person, or group of people, who have been participating in the process of writing the criteria, or standard behind the label, may carry out the control. Thus, the way Good Environmental Choice organizes its eco-label, differs from the norm that has evolved during the past decades with clearly independent regulatory functions: standard setting by one actor, certification by private companies specialized in the control function, and accreditation of certification firms by yet another actor. Given the divergent organization of this particular ecolabel, the study uses a qualitative approach and investigates how the particular way of organizing the Good Environmental Choice label has evolved, how it has been justified, and how people engaged in its organization perceive their work. In the discussion, possible explanations are proposed for the high levels of recognition and credibility of this particular eco-label. Some of the challenges of this way of organizing eco-labels are also reflected upon. At a general level, the study contributes to nuance the knowledge about the workings of certification labels and the prominent position they have today in bridging the gap of trust between consumers and (often distanciated) producers.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2014. , 32 p.
Series
SCORE rapportserie, ISSN 1404-5052 ; 2014:2
National Category
Business Administration
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-107561ISBN: 978-91-89658-82-0 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-107561DiVA: diva2:748404
Available from: 2014-09-19 Created: 2014-09-19 Last updated: 2015-02-19Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(229 kB)39 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 229 kBChecksum SHA-512
5d72ede5249b612188071c1a505694cbd05a3322051a2f6b1c61b9c10220b7f40cb24b3b85979c68047baa7836c24b3b5588c3ac77d992cdf47a95c38a18ac69
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Grettve, Sofie
By organisation
Stockholm Centre for Organizational Research (SCORE)
Business Administration

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 39 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 121 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf