Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Att ta ställning: Gymnasieelevers argumentation och beslutsfattande om sociovetenskapliga dilemman
Karlstad University, Faculty of Health, Science and Technology (starting 2013), Department of Engineering and Chemical Sciences. (Lic-FontD)
2014 (Swedish)Licentiate thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

This thesis aims to explore students’ argumentation and decision-making relating to authentic socioscientific issues (SSI). The ability to make informed decisions about socio scientific issues has been recognized to be an important element in science education to achieve the goal of scientific literacy. However, deliberation on SSIs deals with the fact-value intertwinement and has proven to be a tricky affair, both for students and teachers. In paper I, the focus is on upper secondary students’ use of different reasons in arguing about the existence of wolfs in Sweden. To investigate the students’ ability to find supporting reasons from different subject areas in their informal argumentation, the SEE-SEP model was used as an analytical framework. The results showed that the value aspect dominates students’ informal argumentation on the SSI of wolves in Sweden. In paper II a six-step SSI instructional model is presented, designed to develop students’ ability to argue about complex multi-disciplinary issues. This six-step SSI instructional model aims to create a forum that encourages students to interact with one-another and discuss their arguments dynamically. In paper III students’ argumentation and decision-making upon an authentic SSI relating to environmental toxins in fish from the Baltic Sea, was studied. The students’ argumentation and decision making processes were followed closely and data were collected during multiple stages of the SSI-instructional model. The analysis focused on students’ skills of evaluation and the relationships between the values, knowledge and experiences that they used in their argumentation. The results showed that even though all of the students had access to the same information and agreed on the factual aspects of the issue, they came to different decisions, depending on their background values, knowledge and experiences (i.e. their intellectual baggage). Implications for teaching and research are discussed.

Abstract [sv]

 Förmågan att fatta välgrundade beslut i sociovetenskapliga dilemman (SSI) har lyfts fram som ett viktigt inslag i naturvetenskaplig undervisning för att förbereda eleverna på ett liv som medborgare i ett samhälle där kontroversiella frågor med naturvetenskaplig koppling förekommer i allt högre grad. Att hantera SSI-frågor i undervisningen och handskas med sammanflätningen av vetenskapliga fakta, värderingar och etiska perspektiv innebär dock stora utmaningar för både elever och lärare. Fokus i denna avhandling är inriktat mot att ytterligare synliggöra de ingående komponenterna och processerna som sker i arbetet med SSI-frågor, och därmed belysa viktiga aspekter som bör iakttas vid implementering av SSI-frågor i undervisningen. Genom studie I detekteras olika argument baserade på kunskaper, värderingar respektive erfarenheter kopplat till olika ämnesområden, och i studie II förs resonemang att det s.k. intellektuella baggaget, bestående av personliga värderingar, kunskaper och erfarenheter, styr viktning och värdering av olika argument och därmed vilket beslut som slutligen tas. En given slutsats är att SSI-baserad undervisning i det naturvetenskapliga klassrummet alltid måste bygga på en tolerans för en sammanflätning av vetenskapliga fakta, värderingar och etiska perspektiv.

 

 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Karlstad: Karlstads universitet, 2014. , 60 p.
Series
Karlstad University Studies, ISSN 1403-8099 ; 2014:50
Series
Studies in Science and Technology Education, ISSN 1652-5051
Keyword [en]
Science education, Socioscientific issues, SSI, Argumentation, Informal argumentation, Decision-making
Keyword [de]
Naturwissenschaftliche Unterricht
Keyword [sv]
Naturvetenskaplig undervisning, Samhällsfrågor med naturvetenskapligt innehåll, SNI, Sociovetenskapliga dilemman, SSI, Argumentation, Beslutsfattande, Vargar, Dioxiner i fisk
National Category
Educational Sciences
Research subject
Chemistry
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kau:diva-33649ISBN: 978-91-7063-588-5 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kau-33649DiVA: diva2:746525
Presentation
2014-10-24, 12A138, Geijersalen, Karlstad Universitet, 10:00 (Swedish)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2014-10-06 Created: 2014-09-12 Last updated: 2014-10-06Bibliographically approved
List of papers
1. Vargfrågan: Gymnasieelevers argumentation kring ett sociovetenskapligt dilemma
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Vargfrågan: Gymnasieelevers argumentation kring ett sociovetenskapligt dilemma
2012 (Swedish)In: NorDiNa: Nordic Studies in Science Education, ISSN 1504-4556, E-ISSN 1894-1257, Vol. 8, no 1, 43-58 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The focus of this study is the attitudes towards wolves in Sweden among upper secondary students.This socio-scientific issue (SSI) involves many aspects, such as ethical, political and biological aspects,and provides a context to study students’ informal argumentation. The different arguments usedby the students were analyzed using the framework of the SEE-SEP-model. A questionnaire probingattitudes to the existence of wolves in the neighbourhood was distributed to 352 upper secondarystudents. 18 students were interviewed in focused group-interviews (in pairs). The results showedthat 55% of the students showed a negative attitude towards the existence of wolves in the neighbourhood.The analysis of the different aspects of arguments used by the students in the interviewsshowed that arguments based on value were more dominant (60%) than arguments based on knowledge(30%), and arguments based on personal experiences (10%).

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Oslo: The Norwegian Centre for Science Education, 2012
Keyword
Sociovetenskapliga dilemman, SSI, Argumentation, Vargar
National Category
Educational Sciences
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:kau:diva-33717 (URN)
Available from: 2014-09-17 Created: 2014-09-17 Last updated: 2017-12-05Bibliographically approved
2. Umweltgifte in Fischen aus der Ostsee: Eine Strategie zum Umgang mit kontroversen Fragestellungen im naturwissenschaftlichen Unterricht
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Umweltgifte in Fischen aus der Ostsee: Eine Strategie zum Umgang mit kontroversen Fragestellungen im naturwissenschaftlichen Unterricht
2014 (German)In: Der mathematische und naturwissenschaftlich Unterricht (MNU), ISSN 0025-5866, Vol. 67, no 6, 332-336 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [de]

Dieser Artikel diskutiert ein Unterrichtsmodul für die Sekundarstufe II aus dem PROFILES Projekt in Schweden. Thematisiert wird das Problem von Umweltgiften in Fischen aus der Ostsee, welches aus einer naturwissenschaftlich-gesellschaftlichen Sicht behandelt wird. Dabei erlernen die Schüler nicht nur naturwissenschaftliche Hintergründe und Argumente, sondern erwerben auch allgemeine Kompetenzen aus den Bereichen Kommunikation und Bewertung.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Neuss, Tyskland: Verlag Klaus Seeberger, 2014
Keyword
Naturwissenschaftlichen unterricht, Sociovetenskapliga dilemman, SSI, dioxiner i fisk
National Category
Educational Sciences
Research subject
Education
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:kau:diva-33718 (URN)
Available from: 2014-09-17 Created: 2014-09-17 Last updated: 2015-07-07Bibliographically approved
3. The fact-value intertwinement: Investigating upper secondary students’ decision-making concerning socioscientific issues
Open this publication in new window or tab >>The fact-value intertwinement: Investigating upper secondary students’ decision-making concerning socioscientific issues
(English)Manuscript (preprint) (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

This study aims to explore students’ argumentation and decision-making relating to an authentic socioscientific issue (SSI) – the problem of environmental toxins in fish from the Baltic Sea. An instructional exercise module was designed to develop students’ ability to argue about complex multi-disciplinary issues. Seven science majors in the final year of their upper secondary studies participated in the this studyinstructional exercise. Their argumentation and decision making processes were followed closely and data were collected during multiple stages of the instructional moduleexercise: group discussions were tapedaudio recorded, the participants wrote reports on their decision making and submitted them for analysis, and post-exercise interviews were conducted with individual students. The analysis focused on the skills of evaluation demonstrated by the students during the exercise and the relationships between the values, knowledge and experiences that they used in their argumentation. Even though all of the students had access to the same information and agreed on the factual aspects of the issue, they came to different decisions. All of the students took counter-arguments and the limitations of their claims into account, and were able to extend their claims where appropriate. However, their decisions differed depending on their background values, knowledge and experiences (i.e. their intellectual baggage).

Keyword
Socioscientific issues, SSI, Decision-making, Informal argumentation, Intellectual baggage
National Category
Educational Sciences
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:kau:diva-33719 (URN)
Available from: 2014-09-17 Created: 2014-09-17 Last updated: 2017-12-06Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(2002 kB)225 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 2002 kBChecksum SHA-512
736d9dde364387fd7c89fc6c5bd736f8a6c743c79f2fbb3c0c2c493a7c2b1c39ab8d91a12797ff3f8de74319aeae0ffd2e82178b99cf6e16589c4758f1887620
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Eriksson, Martin
By organisation
Department of Engineering and Chemical Sciences
Educational Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 225 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 296 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf