Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Contaminants in fish from potentially polluted sites along the Swedish coast with the nationalmonitoring programme as reference
Executive, Naturhistoriska riksmuseet, NRM.
Executive, Naturhistoriska riksmuseet, NRM.
Executive, Naturhistoriska riksmuseet, NRM.
Executive, Naturhistoriska riksmuseet, NRM.
Show others and affiliations
Responsible organisation
2014 (English)Report (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

In this report, fish from potentially polluted sites along the coast of Sweden were analysed for several contaminants and when possible also compared with concentrations in fish from

reference sites used within the national monitoring programme for contaminants in marine

biota. However, it is important to have in mind that for the polluted sites, sampling has only

been carried one single year and only two pooled samples were analysed from each site,

which could have effects on the representativeness and the uncertainty of the results.

Generally, perch and herring from Lilla Värtan had the highest concentrations of mercury,

lead, nickel, silver, CB-153 and CB-118, DDE, dioxins, brominated flame retardants,

perfluorinated chemicals, chlorinated paraffins and organotin compounds compared to the

other polluted sites. Among the stations where eelpout and cod were sampled, Rivöfjord had

highest concentration of several contaminants. The contaminants include mercury, lead,

chromium, CB-153 and CB-118, dioxins, brominated flame retardants, perfluorinated

chemicals, chlorinated paraffins and organotin compounds. It is not very surprising that these two areas show the highest concentrations of several of the investigated contaminants in fish.

Lilla Värtan is situated in Stockholm and hence is affected by the big city, in addition, heavy

boat traffic of different kinds are taking place in this water along with several other harmful

environmental activities in this area. SCCP showed the highest concentrations in herring from

Lilla Värtan, while perch on the contrary had the lowest concentration of SCCP among all of

the perch sites. This is however difficult to explain. Rivö fjord is situated just outside

Gothenburg city and is thus affected by activities in the city. Also, the main part of

Gothenburg’s harbor activities takes place close by Rivö fjord. Moreover, Ryaverken, which

is a sewage treatment plant, and two refineries are also affecting the water. Thus, the two

largest cities in Sweden contribute with a cocktail of contaminants to its surrounding waters.

In addition, fish from Skelleftebukten, herring and/or perch, had elevated concentrations of

lead, cadmium, nickel, copper, HCB and BDE-47 and -154. The elevated concentrations of

different metals in this area could be caused by Rönnskärsverken, which releases metals. In

addition, there are several industries and mining practices in the area that could have

contributed with high metal levels. Furthermore, dismantlement activities might contribute

with the high levels of brominated flame retardants found in this area.

Kungsbackafjorden, on the Swedish west coast, had high concentrations of cadmium and

copper in cod and high concentrations of perfluorinated chemicals in both eelpout and cod.

There is a sewage treatment plant in the area, which might be one explanation for elevated

concentrations of perfluorinated chemicals.

Most of the other selected polluted sites for this study had none or just a few contaminants

that differed from the reference sites in the vicinity. Thus it seems that these sites might not be as burdened by local sources of the investigated substances as has been assumed. On the other hand, when comparing the concentrations with their target values, a few of the contaminants at these sites were above the target values, this included mercury, CB-118, PBDEs and TBT.

However, the concentrations were not significantly different from reference values, which

indicates a more widespread problem concerning these contaminants.

When comparing contaminant concentrations with their respective target value, mercury

concentrations exceeded the target value for all species at all sites except for herring from

Örnsköldsviksfjärden. Lead was below the target value at all sites and cadmium was also

below at all sites except for perch from Skelleftebukten, which exceeded the target value.

4 CB-153 was in general below the target value, but cod from Rivö fjord and perch from Lilla

Värtan exceeded it. In contrast, most polluted sites were above the target value for CB-118

with a few exceptions. Concentrations of DDE were generally below the target value,

however perch and herring from Lilla Värtan exceeded it and concentrations of DDE in cod

liver were also above, while the concentration in cod muscle were below target value. HCHs,

HCB, dioxins, PFOS and HBCDD were below target values for all species at all sites. PBDEs

on the other hand exceed the target value for all species at all sites. Concentrations of the

priority substances, DEHP (Di-(2-ethylhexyl)-phthalate), HCBD (Hexachlorobutadiene), and

PeCB (Pentachlorobenzene) were below the target values, these compounds were even below LOQ at most sites. SCCP (short-chained chlorinated paraffins) were well below the target level for all species at all sites. TBT on the other hand, were in perch above the target value at all sites except at Inre Slätbaken and Skelleftebukten. Yttre fjärden and Lilla Värtan had the highest concentrations of TBT and here the target value was also exceeded in herring. Eelpout and cod had concentrations of TBT below the target value.

In conclusion, Lilla Värtan seems to be the site with the highest concentrations of several

contaminants and also where several of these exceed the target values. Rivö fjord and

Skelleftebukten also had higher concentrations of several contaminants compared to the other polluted sites.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2014. , 155 p.
Series
Report, 8:2014
National Category
Environmental Sciences
Research subject
Finance, National; Environmental Objectives, A Non-Toxic Environment; Environmental Objectives, A Balanced Marine Environ­ment, Flourishing Coastal Areas and Archipelagos; Miljöövervakningens programområden, Coast and sea; Coast and sea, Återkommande mätkampanjer
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:naturvardsverket:diva-1753OAI: oai:DiVA.org:naturvardsverket-1753DiVA: diva2:746020
Available from: 2014-09-11 Created: 2014-09-11 Last updated: 2014-09-25Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(9348 kB)74 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 9348 kBChecksum SHA-512
b8ea87780e3a877a1bc037801bd86ab738a58cd70d0f45ba3410836b9e976281eae753f9f18795d762d2f09a00d9bdc108345fa330f05ad56faee516ffeb2fae
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Naturhistoriska riksmuseet, NRM
Environmental Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 74 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 188 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf