Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The harm argument against surrogacy revisited: two versions not to forget
Linköping University, Department of Culture and Communication, Arts and Humanities. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.
2014 (English)In: Medicine, Health care and Philosophy, ISSN 1386-7423, E-ISSN 1572-8633, Vol. 17, no 3, 357-363 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

It has been a common claim that surrogacy is morally problematic since it involves harm to the child or the surrogate-the harm argument. Due to a growing body of empirical research, the harm argument has seen a decrease in popularity, as there seems to be little evidence of harmful consequences of surrogacy. In this article, two revised versions of the harm argument are developed. It is argued that the two suggested versions of the harm argument survive the current criticism against the standard harm argument. The first version argues that the child is harmed by being separated from the gestational mother. The second version directs attention to the fact that surrogacy involves great incentives to keep the gestational mothers level of maternal-fetal attachment low, which tend to increase the risk of harm to the child. While neither of the two arguments is conclusive regarding the moral status of surrogacy, both constitute important considerations that are often ignored.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer Netherlands, 2014. Vol. 17, no 3, 357-363 p.
Keyword [en]
Attachment; Ethics of motherhood; Harm argument; Maternal-fetal attachment; Reproductive ethics; Surrogacy
National Category
Other Humanities
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-109365DOI: 10.1007/s11019-014-9557-xISI: 000338833700005PubMedID: 24664239OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-109365DiVA: diva2:738074
Available from: 2014-08-15 Created: 2014-08-15 Last updated: 2017-12-05Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(429 kB)2750 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 429 kBChecksum SHA-512
6713014b2ed3e1664cd93826c452a1bfa394ea5c64cda5645628fe81d50dcd2629a110752534a016e0f4690e4319050481d8be9390773806ab0cb6bd54ec97ff
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Johansson Agnafors, Marcus
By organisation
Arts and HumanitiesFaculty of Arts and Sciences
In the same journal
Medicine, Health care and Philosophy
Other Humanities

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 2750 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 273 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf