Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Ämnesintegrering och ämnesspecialisering: SO-undervisning i Sverige 1980-2014
Karlstad University, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (starting 2013), Centre for the Studies of Social Sciences Didactics.
2014 (Swedish)In: Nordidactica: Journal of Humanities and Social Science Education, ISSN 2000-9879, no 2014:1, 85-118 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

A major issue in Swedish and international research has, indeed, been the overriding purpose of social studies, along with the recurring discussion on whether the teaching of social studies should be organised in the individual subjects or be subject-integrated. The main aim of this article is to analyse how social studies as a specific field of study is featured in government commissions of inquiry and steering documents in the period 1980-2014. The analysis is primarily based on American and Nordic history and social studies education theory, which has identified a number of concepts regarding the purpose and organization of the social studies subject; the humanistic approach; the progressively approach; the disciplinary oriented approach and the postmodern and interpretive approach. The article is based on an analysis of national evaluations and reviews of social studies as well as curricula and government commissioned inquiries. The analysis shows that social studies as a knowledge domain is characterized by progressivism in the national evaluations in the whole period. Although curricula nowadays have a disciplinary perspective on the purpose and organization of social studies, progressivism is still prevalent in evaluations. It is clear that the public authorities responsible for the most recent inspections embrace progressivism. Concurrent with the predominance of certain education philosophies–progressivism in 1980-2011 and the disciplinary perspective from 2011– there are also traces of other approaches in the curricula, for example, the humanistic as well as the postmodern perspectives.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Karlstad: CSD Karlstad , 2014. no 2014:1, 85-118 p.
Keyword [en]
SOCIAL STUDIES, HISTORY, CURRICULUM DEBATE, INTERDISCIPLINARY
National Category
Didactics
Research subject
Education
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kau:diva-33319OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kau-33319DiVA: diva2:736194
Available from: 2014-08-05 Created: 2014-08-04 Last updated: 2017-12-05Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(585 kB)451 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 585 kBChecksum SHA-512
0ad737e254b33e0d576b9695e92b25bdda67178a89bb4bee1edee9d7aecdae6b080ba6a78cefba541c27294d340c3ae0ac3041433394235ba7fe3186ab0b0789
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Authority records BETA

Samuelsson, Johan

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Samuelsson, Johan
By organisation
Centre for the Studies of Social Sciences Didactics
In the same journal
Nordidactica: Journal of Humanities and Social Science Education
Didactics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 451 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 1841 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf