Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
“Civilizations” and Political-Institutional Paths: A Sequence Analysis of the MaxRange2 Data Set, 1789 – 2013
Halmstad University, School of Business, Engineering and Science, Centre for Innovation, Entrepreneurship and Learning Research (CIEL).
Halmstad University, School of Education, Humanities and Social Science, Center for Social Analysis (CESAM).ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9495-3571
2014 (English)Conference paper, Published paper (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

In what sequences have nations changed institutionally in history and does that order matter for later democratization? If so, are there historical-institutional pathways of “civilizations”? These previously neglected research problems are addressed in this paper on the basis of a new, unique, and enormous data set tracking all political institutions and systems in the world monthly since 1789. The aim is both empirical and theoretical: to take steps toward an understanding of the sequential aspects of political-institutional evolution. Results visualize sequences at regime level that show few signs of path dependency. They also show that democracy may emerge in all types of regimes, though at varying paces. Separating religious-majority nations, Muslim systems are less affected by democracy diffusion than other religious-majority nations. Muslim political systems also exhibit larger regime type unpredictability. Taken together with estimates of GDP per capita, majority religions explain a minor share of discrepancies between regime types: wealth of nations is more important than majority religion on a general, regime type diversity level. However, specifications of institutional details will have to be made in future research in this new area of historical political-institutional study.    

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2014. 1-46 p.
Keyword [en]
sequence analysis, democracy, institutions, path dependence, regime types
National Category
Political Science (excluding Public Administration Studies and Globalization Studies) Globalization Studies
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hh:diva-26210OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hh-26210DiVA: diva2:735899
Conference
110th APSA (American Political Science Association) Annual Meeting 2014, Washington D.C., USA, August 28–31, 2014
Available from: 2014-08-04 Created: 2014-08-04 Last updated: 2017-03-24Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1694 kB)78 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1694 kBChecksum SHA-512
fc9196088c2deb6c06d6f121e9c1599d225c17c001c697e915341f12330b758145726d73646a8d8b8f2c83967a171afb4976dbcaa03f1abef0f41394308eaf33
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Rånge, MaxSandberg, Mikael
By organisation
Centre for Innovation, Entrepreneurship and Learning Research (CIEL)Center for Social Analysis (CESAM)
Political Science (excluding Public Administration Studies and Globalization Studies)Globalization Studies

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 78 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 185 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf