Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The effect of breed selection on interpreting human directed cues in the domestic dog
Linköping University, Department of Physics, Chemistry and Biology, Biology. Linköping University, The Institute of Technology.
2014 (English)Independent thesis Basic level (degree of Bachelor), 180 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

During the course of time, artificial selection has given rise to a great diversity among today's dogs. Humans and dogs have evolved side by side and dogs have come to understand human body language relatively well. This study investigates whether selection pressure and domestication could reveal differences in dogs’ skill to interpret human directional cues, such as distal pointing. In this study, 46 pet dogs were tested from 27 breeds and 6 crossbreeds for performance in the two-way object choice task. Breeds that are selected to work with eye contact of humans were compared with breeds that are selected to work more independently. Dogs of different skull shape were also compared, as well as age, sex and previous training on similar tasks. No significant differences in performance were found between dogs of various age, sex or skull shape. There was a tendency for significant difference in performance if the dog had been previously trained on similar tasks. When dogs that made 100% one-sided choices were excluded, a tendency appeared for there to be a difference between the cooperative worker breeds compared to the other breeds for the time it took for dogs to make a choice. There is a correlation between the number of correct choices made and the latency for the dogs from being release to making a choice (choice latency). All groups of dogs, regardless of my categorization, performed above chance level, showing that dogs have a general ability to follow, and understand, human distal pointing.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2014. , 17 p.
Keyword [en]
behaviour, dogs, domestication, human pointing, gesture, selection, skull shape
National Category
Behavioral Sciences Biology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-108847ISRN: LITH-IFM-G-EX—14/2886—SEOAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-108847DiVA: diva2:733298
Subject / course
Biology
Presentation
2014-06-05, Linköping, 11:40 (Swedish)
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2014-07-10 Created: 2014-07-08 Last updated: 2014-11-28Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1209 kB)151 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1209 kBChecksum SHA-512
19a77c663d60943f605cedd477fd6a6d17a25c28c9b90490571ccc17944de84d6f8dc3be138d25956e2d3bb83e315954165dcaeaedb815faeb2b1d227baff9d6
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Winnerhall, Louise
By organisation
BiologyThe Institute of Technology
Behavioral Sciences Biology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 151 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 155 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf