Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Uncertainty comparison of Digital Elevation Models derived from different image file formats
University of Gävle, Faculty of Engineering and Sustainable Development, Department of Industrial Development, IT and Land Management.
2014 (English)Independent thesis Basic level (degree of Bachelor), 180 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) have become increasingly popular recently for surveying and mapping because of their efficiency in acquiring remotely sensed data in a short amount of time and the low cost associated with them. They are used to generate digital elevation models (DEM) derived from aerial photography for various purposes such as the documentation of cultural heritage sites, archaeological surveying or earthwork volume calculations.

This thesis investigates the possible effects different file formats may have on the quality of elevation models. In this thesis, an UAS survey was simulated using a digital camera to produce six DEMs based on JPEG, TIFF and RAW format in Agisoft Photoscan by taking two sets of images of a city model, in different light conditions. Furthermore, a reference DEM was produced in Geomagic Studio using data from a Leica Nova MS50 Multistation. The DEMs were then compared in Geomagic Control.

The results from the 3D comparison in Geomagic Control show that the standard deviation of all elevation models is 4 mm with the exception of the elevation model derived from raw-edited images taken with lighting, which has a standard deviation of nearly 6 mm. Also, all of the models have an average deviation of 0.4 mm or less. The significant deviations in all DEMs occur in areas where the multistation lacked vision of certain objects of the city model such as walls, or on the edges of the analysed area. Additionally, the georeferencing results from Photoscan show that the DEMs based on normal light condition images have slightly lower georeferencing errors than the DEMs with lighting. It has been concluded that it is difficult to say whether file formats have any noticeably effect on the uncertainty of digital elevation models.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2014. , iv+32+appendixes p.
Keyword [en]
UAV, UAS, DEM, RAW format
National Category
Other Civil Engineering
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hig:diva-17193OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hig-17193DiVA: diva2:731604
Subject / course
Lantmäteriteknik
Educational program
Surveying
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2014-07-02 Created: 2014-06-29 Last updated: 2014-07-07Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1784 kB)971 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT03.pdfFile size 1784 kBChecksum SHA-512
57bbd2c93402996abdb73b78ee65cbad3479aa840772cd0cc9e82a66999e4337939deddc821033e6f3e9250a57fafc955bc5d96926b80c45ebf7a1cfd79d1b7f
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Department of Industrial Development, IT and Land Management
Other Civil Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 1008 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 363 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf