Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Brand Building: Differences between how business-to-business companies and business-to-consumer companies build their brands
Halmstad University, School of Business and Engineering (SET).
Halmstad University, School of Business and Engineering (SET).
2014 (English)Independent thesis Advanced level (degree of Master (One Year)), 20 credits / 30 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

Abstract

Title: Brand Building – Differences between how business-to-business companies and business-to-consumer companies build their brands.

Authors: Louise Lönnqvist and Sofia Stierna

Supervisor: Svante Andersson

Level: Master thesis, Independent project in business administration (30 credits), Spring 2014

Keywords: Brand, Brand Building, Brand Equity, Business-to-business, Business-to- consumer.

Research questions: Q1: How can the brand building process differ between business-to- business companies and business-to-consumer companies? Q2: How can brand equity differ between business-to-business companies and business-to-consumer companies?

Purpose: The purpose with this study is to investigate the differences between how business- to-business and business-to-consumer companies build their brands. First the differences in the brand building process are going to be investigated. Furthermore, this leads to an investigation in how brand equity differs between business-to-business companies and business-to-consumer companies.

Theoretical framework: The theoretical framework starts with an explanation about what a brand is and an explanation of the differences between business-to-business companies and business-to-consumer companies. Furthermore, relevant theories about the brand building process and brand equity are discussed.

Methodology: A qualitative method and abductive approach were used in order to answer the research questions. Personal interviews were conducted with three business-to-business companies and three business-to-consumer companies in order to get a view over the brand building.

Empirical data: The empirical findings from the six interviews based on the theory are presented.

Analysis: The analysis is based on the theoretical framework together with the empirical data.

Conclusion: We have come up with the conclusion that all companies have their own brand building process and it does not matter if it is a business-to-business company or a business- to-consumer company, no major difference have been found. It is not important exactly how the brand building process looks like and which stages that are included, the key is that companies work with brand building in some way, although more studies are required in order to confirm the results. Furthermore, the two brand equity factors external brand loyalty and perceived quality are more important for business-to-business companies and the business-to-consumer prefer a combination of all the factors. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2014.
Keyword [en]
Brand, Brand Building, Brand Equity, Business-to-business, Business-to- consumer
National Category
Business Administration
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hh:diva-26028OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hh-26028DiVA: diva2:731594
Subject / course
International Marketing
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2014-08-05 Created: 2014-07-01 Last updated: 2014-08-05Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

Brand Building(2161 kB)326 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 2161 kBChecksum SHA-512
5434158b25ba378202eada9a12b1ad447fb4920a68b50e8996e7a5d183dbec614f8c81f2ace0e4d72127bfee5ba4943847f908b90c632fc8193919ca47979912
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
School of Business and Engineering (SET)
Business Administration

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 326 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 783 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf