Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Kidney sales and the analogy with dangerous employment
Linköping University, Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Division of Community Medicine. Linköping University, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3071-9609
2015 (English)In: Health Care Analysis, ISSN 1065-3058, E-ISSN 1573-3394, Vol. 23, no 2, 107-121 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Proponents of permitting living kidney sales often argue as follows. Many jobs involve significant risks; people are and should be free to take these risks in exchange for money; the risks involved in giving up a kidney are no greater than the risks involved in acceptable hazardous jobs; so people should be free to give up a kidney for money, too. This paper examines this frequently invoked but rarely analysed analogy. Two objections are raised. First, it is far from clear that kidney sales and dangerous jobs involve comparable risks on an appropriately broad comparison. Second, and more importantly, even if they do involve comparable risks it does not follow that kidney sales must be permitted because dangerous jobs are. The analogy assumes that kidney sales are banned for paternalistic reasons. But there may be other, non-paternalistic reasons for the ban. And paternalists, too, can consistently defend the ban even if kidney sales are no riskier than occupations that they find acceptable. Soft paternalists may want to protect would-be vendors from harms that they have not voluntarily chosen. Egalitarian hard paternalists may want to protect already badly off vendors from further worsening their situation. For neither species of paternalist is the size of the risk prevented decisive. I conclude that the analogy with dangerous jobs, while rhetorically powerful, pulls little real argumentative weight. Future debates on living kidney sales should therefore proceed without it.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
New York: Springer Science+Business Media B.V., 2015. Vol. 23, no 2, 107-121 p.
Keyword [en]
Analogical reasoning, Ethics, Organ sales, Paternalism, Risks and benefits, Transplantation
National Category
Philosophy Medical Ethics
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-108337DOI: 10.1007/s10728-013-0270-3ISI: 000353287800001PubMedID: 24370887OAI: diva2:729952
Available from: 2014-06-26 Created: 2014-06-26 Last updated: 2016-05-04Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(200 kB)136 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT02.pdfFile size 200 kBChecksum SHA-512
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Malmqvist, Erik
By organisation
Division of Community MedicineFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences
In the same journal
Health Care Analysis
PhilosophyMedical Ethics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 136 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 403 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link