Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Ambivalence in calculating the future: the case of re-engineering the world
Linköping University, The Tema Institute, Technology and Social Change. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences. (LUCE)
2014 (English)In: Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences, ISSN 1943-815X, E-ISSN 1943-8168, ISSN 1943-815X, Vol. 11, no 2, 125-142 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Recently, climate engineering and particularly sulphur aerosol injection (SAI) have entered the arena of international climate change politics. The idea behind SAI is very simple: to reflect sunlight and heat back into space by injecting particles into the stratosphere. SAI has the theoretical potential to moderate anthropogenic climate change in a timely fashion and at very low costs but may also cause major environmental harm. Determining the future of SAI will entail dealing with many major uncertainties such as assessing risks, costs and benefits. This paper critically investigates scientific knowledge production under conditions of major uncertainty. It discusses how uncertainty, ethics and social considerations are treated in the SAI literature, which applies techno-economic models. In the simplest studies, important uncertainties are excluded from the models, but the more complex studies include many uncertainties, which may have considerable influence on the results and recommendations. In some cases the modelled results are overshadowed or strengthened by ethical discussions or methodological reflexivity that emphasize uncertainties and model limitations. There seems to be ambivalence between constructing certainty, on one hand, and an awareness of methodological limitations, on the other. Finally, the value of these papers for decision-makers and other concerned groups is discussed.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Taylor & Francis, 2014. Vol. 11, no 2, 125-142 p.
Keyword [en]
climate engineering, geoengineering, sulphur aerosol injection, modelling, uncertainty, climate change
National Category
Social Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-108316DOI: 10.1080/1943815X.2014.921629ISI: 000337948900003OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-108316DiVA: diva2:729793
Projects
LUCE
Funder
Formas, 2012-1838
Available from: 2014-06-26 Created: 2014-06-26 Last updated: 2017-12-05Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

hansson2014(187 kB)75 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 187 kBChecksum SHA-512
0046f9101065d10f823ecdddc4fe67d1d410587988d3a7d2e8290849528f2970b4cefe936fb5aa8a183ce8f899309bc508d3248db9704747e1b82b36fe1cdb71
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Hansson, Anders
By organisation
Technology and Social ChangeFaculty of Arts and Sciences
In the same journal
Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences
Social Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 75 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 175 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf