Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Formative and Summative Assessment: Contradictories or Joint Opportunities?
Linnaeus University, Faculty of Technology, Department of Mechanical Engineering.
2014 (English)In: Proceeding of the 10th international CDIO Conference: Sharing Successful Engineering Education Experiences, CDIO , 2014Conference paper, Oral presentation with published abstract (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

Formative assessment is used for monitoring student learning in order to provide the student with relevant feedback, while summative assessment is used to evaluate student learning outcomes. Traditionally, these two concepts are seen as counterparts or contradictories, and this might result in a belief that one is to be preferred in favour for the other. In fact, they both are important measures in creating an efficient learning environment, and in reality they are often combined. This contribution discusses the benefits of both concepts and in particular how one and same assignment could be utilised both for summative and formative purposes. The discussion is exemplified using experience from a first year course in project management and academic writing entitled “Technical projects and report writing”. In the course, summative as well as formative assessment methods are utilised. The interconnection between assessment methods and the integration of both summative and formative aspects in some of the assignments is highlighted. We will also address how the setup is communicated to the students and their feedback and reflections on the course and their learning outcomes.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
CDIO , 2014.
Keyword [en]
Formative assessment, Summative assessment, Project management, Course activities’ design, Standards: 3, 8, 11
National Category
Educational Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-35460ISBN: 978-84-697-2147-6 (print)ISBN: 84-697-2147-X (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:lnu-35460DiVA: diva2:727712
Conference
10th international CDIO Conference, 15-19 June 2014, Barcelona, Spain
Available from: 2014-06-23 Created: 2014-06-23 Last updated: 2015-04-08Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

Full abstract(183 kB)261 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 183 kBChecksum SHA-512
345d6b2f16a70f24417b928dca63cc3275af0dd3b746aaf4a3fd8fc0f5223c104b703c90c21cfd6fb66bf14fa991b4273a97c14162d0cc8232b876b0244a5664
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Kans, Mirka
By organisation
Department of Mechanical Engineering
Educational Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 261 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 818 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf