Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Performance of fat-tailed Value-at-risk: A comparison using backtesting on the OMXS30
Jönköping University, Jönköping International Business School, JIBS, Economics, Finance and Statistics.
Jönköping University, Jönköping International Business School, JIBS, Economics, Finance and Statistics.
2014 (English)Independent thesis Advanced level (degree of Master (One Year)), 20 credits / 30 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

The aim of this thesis is to test if the application of fat tailed distributions in value-at-risk models is of better use for risk managers than the Normal distribution. Value-at-risk is a regulatory tool used in Basel regulations. Basel II and III regulate capital required by banks according to value-at-risk backtest results. Value-at-risk is therefore of great importance for financial institutions and banks. The models used for the value-at-risk estimation are rolling ARMA(1,1)-GARCH(1,1) models with Normal, Student’s t, and Generalized hyperbolic distributed errors. The performance of the value-at-risk models was estimated using backtest forecasting on a thousand day out-of-sample window, based on the OMXS30 index. Results reveal that the normal value-at-risk model performs worse compared to the non-normal value-at-risk models. Density forecasts show that value-at-risk estimates directly benefit from including parameters of kurtosis. However, evaluation tests show that none of the models underestimate value-at-risk, and therefore the rejection of the Normal distribution in value-at-risk estimation is not sufficiently justified.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2014. , 62 p.
Keyword [en]
Risk management, Value-at-Risk, VaR, Fat-tails, Backtesting, GARCH
National Category
Business Administration
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-24002OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hj-24002DiVA: diva2:725959
Subject / course
IHH, Business Administration
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2015-06-22 Created: 2014-06-05 Last updated: 2015-06-22Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

Performance of fat-tailed value-at-risk: a comparison using backtesting on the OMXS30(1869 kB)450 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT02.pdfFile size 1869 kBChecksum SHA-512
7bdb8e01a34e26b5f5b6ee4d50687b74b700ee26257ce2caceefd8a7b6d118747415ee42cb643b3142f2289548485a479cf30b608af2ed34533c1976293d5060
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
JIBS, Economics, Finance and Statistics
Business Administration

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 450 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 275 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf