Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
A Comparison of Finite Element Model Error Localization Methods
Chalmers University of Technology. (Maskinteknik)ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4404-5708
Chalmers University of Technology. (Strukturdynamik)
1999 (English)In: 1999 IMAC XVII - 17th International Modal Analysis Conference, Orlando, Florida, 1999, 929-935 p.Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

The aim of this study is to compare a new and some existing finite element model error localization methods. The methods are applied to two problems. First, fundamental properties of the error localization methods are studied on a simple sprung mass  system.  In  the second  problem  a  three-bay  frame structure is studied. Here the analytical results of a finite element analysis is taken as substitute for measured data. The model differences between this model and a perturbed model are then found by use of error localization methods.

When data from a known finite element model take place as substitute for test data, the cause of the differences between the data sets are known. A so-called consistent para- meterization, i.e. a parameterization of the quantities known to be in error, is then possible. The error localization method are  compared for both consistent and inconsistent parameterization.

A pre-error localization is made. It is based on the finite element model’s properties. Candidate model parameters, possibly in error, for which the experimental data are not informative,  are  rejected.  Non-identifiable  parameters  are also rejected. Quantification of data information richness and identifiability with newly developed index numbers support the pre-error localization.

Four error localization methods are compared. Two of these are developed by Lallement and Piranda. These are the so- called Balancing of Eigenvalue Equation and Best Subspace Methods. The third is developed by Link and Santiago and is the Substructure Energy Function Method. A new localization method, using gradient and Hessian information of the error criterion function, constitute the fourth method.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Orlando, Florida, 1999. 929-935 p.
Keyword [en]
Error Localization Finite Element Updating
National Category
Applied Mechanics
Research subject
Technology (byts ev till Engineering), Mechanical Engineering
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-34575OAI: oai:DiVA.org:lnu-34575DiVA: diva2:721019
Conference
IMAC XVII - 17th International Modal Analysis Conference - Modal Analysis: Reducing the Time to Market
Available from: 2014-06-03 Created: 2014-06-03 Last updated: 2015-05-24Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

A COMPARISION OF FINITE ELEMENT MODEL ERROR LOCALIZATION METHODS.pdf(454 kB)79 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 454 kBChecksum SHA-512
e63d30b95c5688bce71f177e83278eeaa254f6401d88ba7e80976e93c6a995b804c832dbc2badbfa480f6964f7f94c1af98de59ecde4afdc5238f7928710b52e
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Larsson, Andreas
Applied Mechanics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 79 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 128 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf