Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Examining Accuracy: Drönare och drönarangrepp: retorik, praktik och historia
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts, Department of History of Science and Ideas.
2014 (Swedish)Independent thesis Basic level (degree of Bachelor), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

The military conflicts of the early 21st century have seen the introduction and rise of a new military technology: the armed drone. With the United States acting as the driving force behind this technological advancement, the U.S Air Force and intelligence agency CIA have madedrones their weapon of choice for pursuing suspected terrorists and insurgents in various remotelocations. American military leaders and policy makers assert that the armed drone’s high levelof accuracy make it the best available weapons platform for this task. However, new researchshows that the use of drones may result in more civilian casualties than previously thought, andmay in fact be more fallible than conventional aircraft in this respect. This paper examines this discrepancy between rhetoric and practice, and attempts to find potential causes for this in the development and early use of the first armed drone, the MQ-1 Predator. The paper cites statements from President Barack Obama and CIA director John Brennan and contrasts them with a recent research report on drone-caused civilian casualties, as well as examples of drone strikes where the wrong targets were struck. The analysis of the development and early use of the Predator Drone draws comparisons to Donald Mackenzie’s account of the development of accuracy for cold-war-era intercontinental ballistic missiles, applying the science and technology-concepts he uses to the case of the armed drone. The paper concludes with the argument that the accuracy of the early armed drones is fundamentally misunderstood or overestimated by U.S leaders, and that there are circumstances in the development-history of the system that may have contributed to this inconsistency.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2014. , 33 p.
Keyword [en]
Armed drones, civilian casualties, accuracy, military technology, science and technology
National Category
History of Ideas
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-225414OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-225414DiVA: diva2:720992
Educational program
Systems in Technology and Society Programme
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2014-06-11 Created: 2014-06-03 Last updated: 2014-06-11Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

Examining Accuracy: Drönare och drönarangrepp: retorik, praktik och historia(657 kB)237 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 657 kBChecksum SHA-512
572e03a6ccd9c85903be1d94ef9db959a892d30ed82a6a5db936beb12a6b01ed1f9682cd92b6819bc2cb65734eb4ce09571dff258fc549193930fb7677c4019d
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Department of History of Science and Ideas
History of Ideas

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 237 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 898 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf