Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Accurate calculations of geometries and singlet-triplet energy differences for active-site models of [NiFe] hydrogenase
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Science and Technology, Chemistry, Department of Chemistry - Ångström, Theoretical Chemistry.
Show others and affiliations
2014 (English)In: Physical Chemistry, Chemical Physics - PCCP, ISSN 1463-9076, E-ISSN 1463-9084, Vol. 16, no 17, 7927-7938 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

We have studied the geometry and singlet-triplet energy difference of two mono-nuclear Ni2+ models related to the active site in [NiFe] hydrogenase. Multiconfigurational second-order perturbation theory based on a complete active-space wavefunction with an active space of 12 electrons in 12 orbitals, CASPT2(12,12), reproduces experimental bond lengths to within 1 pm. Calculated singlet-triplet energy differences agree with those obtained from coupled-cluster calculations with single, double and (perturbatively treated) triple excitations (CCSD(T)) to within 12 kJ mol(-1). For a bimetallic model of the active site of [NiFe] hydrogenase, the CASPT2(12,12) results were compared with the results obtained with an extended active space of 22 electrons in 22 orbitals. This is so large that we need to use restricted active-space theory (RASPT2). The calculations predict that the singlet state is 48-57 kJ mol(-1) more stable than the triplet state for this model of the Ni-Sl(a) state. However, in the [NiFe] hydrogenase protein, the structure around the Ni ion is far from the square-planar structure preferred by the singlet state. This destabilises the singlet state so that it is only similar to 24 kJ mol(-1) more stable than the triplet state. Finally, we have studied how various density functional theory methods compare to the experimental, CCSD(T), CASPT2, and RASPT2 results. Semi-local functionals predict the best singlet-triplet energy differences, with BP86, TPSS, and PBE giving mean unsigned errors of 12-13 kJ mol(-1) (maximum errors of 25-31 kJ mol(-1)) compared to CCSD(T). For bond lengths, several methods give good results, e. g. TPSS, BP86, and M06, with mean unsigned errors of 2 pm for the bond lengths if relativistic effects are considered.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2014. Vol. 16, no 17, 7927-7938 p.
National Category
Theoretical Chemistry
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-224932DOI: 10.1039/c4cp00253aISI: 000334200400033OAI: diva2:720083
Available from: 2014-05-28 Created: 2014-05-23 Last updated: 2014-05-28Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(3007 kB)152 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 3007 kBChecksum SHA-512
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Delcey, Mickaël G.Lindh, Roland
By organisation
Theoretical Chemistry
In the same journal
Physical Chemistry, Chemical Physics - PCCP
Theoretical Chemistry

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 152 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 461 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link