Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Communication to the public: A study in light of Article 3(1) of the InfoSoc Directive (2001/29/EC)
Jönköping University, Jönköping International Business School, JIBS, Commercial Law.
2014 (English)Independent thesis Advanced level (degree of Master (Two Years)), 20 credits / 30 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

The intellectual property concept of ‘communication to the public’ in Article 3(1) of the InfoSoc Directive is a current issue within the EU, as the means of communication increase all the time due to the fast development of the information society. Accordingly, the CJEU has more than occasionally been instructed to rule upon this provision, as the Member States of the EU are unconfident as to how it should be interpreted. The poor guidance provided for in the preamble of the InfoSoc Directive in terms of how to construe the provision does probably contribute to this confusion.

Article 3(1) of the InfoSoc Directive has been subject to disputes as concerns different means of communication, that is to say broadcasting, live performances, streaming and hyperlinking. Broadcasting and streaming are generally considered as communications within the meaning of the provision whereas live performances and hyperlinking have been deemed as falling outside the scope. More in detail, the most important criteria of a ‘communication to the public’ – laid down by the CJEU – suggest that the concept should be interpreted broadly, covering all transmissions and retransmissions where equipment facilitates for communications of signs, sounds or images, regardless of the means used and the nature of the place for the communication. A public refers to an indeterminate but fairly high number of people – considering the potential number rather than the exact number – not present at the place where the communication originates.

The gap between the wording of Article 3(1) of the InfoSoc Directive and the developments carried out by the CJEU is considered troublesome since it decreases the legal certainty of the provision. A future recasting of these matters should thus contemplate the possibility to integrate the criteria laid down by the CJEU into the law.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2014. , 57 p.
Keyword [en]
Communication to the public, InfoSoc Directive, Broadcasting, Live performances, Streaming, Hyperlinking
National Category
Law (excluding Law and Society)
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-23837OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hj-23837DiVA: diva2:718514
Subject / course
IHH, Commercial Law
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2014-06-03 Created: 2014-05-21 Last updated: 2014-06-03Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(725 kB)376 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 725 kBChecksum SHA-512
8e6704f845543894c89dc9aac36bcf9657e0c0a3c4bfb3ade7782889dc446811b82875baf269bfa85931e11837c10caf10675aff10f19874355ee785d0969002
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Brandt, Ludvig
By organisation
JIBS, Commercial Law
Law (excluding Law and Society)

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 376 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 549 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf