Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Accountability in context: Effects of research evaluation systems on publication practices, disciplinary norms and individual working routines in the faculty of Arts at Uppsala University
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts, Department of ALM.
Leiden University.
2015 (English)In: Research Evaluation, ISSN 0958-2029, E-ISSN 1471-5449, Vol. 24, no 1, 63-77 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Given the increased role of bibliometric measures in research evaluation, it is striking that studies of actual changes in research practice are rare. Most studies and comments on ’a metric culture’ in academia focus on the ideological and political level, and there is a clear shortage of empirical studies that analyze how researchers handle demands for accountability in context. In adopting a mixed methods approach involving both bibliometric data and answers form questionnaires we provide an in-depth study of how researchers at the faculty of Arts at Uppsala University (Sweden) respond to the implementation of performance based research evaluation systems. Publication patterns from 2006-2013 show that journal publications, especially English-language ones, is increasing, and the proportion of peer-reviewed publications has doubled. These changes are in line with the incentives of the evaluation systems under study. Answers to the survey confirm that scholars are conscious about this development and several respondents articulate a disagreement between disciplinary norms and external demands. However, disciplinary background as well as career stage or academic age appears to have a significant influence on how individual researchers react to the instigation of evaluation systems. Finally, responses to national and local evaluation regimes are complex, localized and dependent on many factors. In-depth contextualized studies of research practices are needed in order to understand how performance based funding systems influence academic research on the ground.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2015. Vol. 24, no 1, 63-77 p.
Keyword [en]
Research Evaluation, Humanities, Bibliometrics, Publication Patterns, Research Practices, Mixed-methods, Sweden
National Category
Information Studies
Research subject
Library and Information Science
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-224816DOI: 10.1093/reseval/rvu029ISI: 000350114700007OAI: diva2:718313
Available from: 2014-05-20 Created: 2014-05-20 Last updated: 2015-04-12Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(917 kB)894 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT03.pdfFile size 917 kBChecksum SHA-512
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Hammarfelt, Björn
By organisation
Department of ALM
In the same journal
Research Evaluation
Information Studies

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 902 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 339 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link