Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Facework in a Faceless Environment: A Contrastive Analysis of Hedges in Readers' Comments on Political and Personal Issues in E-newspapers
Stockholm University, Faculty of Humanities, Department of English.
2013 (English)Independent thesis Advanced level (degree of Master (One Year)), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

The present study investigates the use of hedging devices in the readers’ comment section of the newspaper The Guardian Online. Two comment sections were chosen for the contrastive study: ‘Politics’ in the subsection ‘Comment is free’ and the series ‘Problem solved’ in the subsection ‘Life and style’. The corpus-based analysis of the frequency of hedges has revealed that the incidence of hedging devices in comments on personal issues is higher (by 19.2%) than on political articles. Three of the most frequently occurring hedging devices, namely, might, SEEM and I (don’t) think underwent further contextual analysis: the utterances containing these items were classified according to their illocutionary force, applying Bach’s (2003) classification of illocutionary acts. The most commonly hedged speech act types, characteristic of each section, were revealed.  Subsequently, an attempt was made to account for these findings from the perspective of ‘face’ and ‘facework’ as represented by Brown and Levinson (1987), Lim and Bowers (1991), MacGeorge, Lichtman and Pressey (2002), Ting-Toomey and Kurogi (1998). Since hedging is considered to be an effective strategy in minimizing ‘threats’ to the face of the addressee, it has  been possible to conclude that in discussions of personal issues participants are more concerned to ‘save’ the addressee’s face than in the case of political matters where the comment writers’ ‘self-face seems to be in the forefront.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2013. , 44 p.
Keyword [en]
Hedging, face, facework, computer-mediated communication, readers’ comments, e-newspapers, speech acts, illocutionary force
National Category
Languages and Literature
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-103407OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-103407DiVA: diva2:717329
Educational program
Språkkonsultprogrammet
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2014-09-29 Created: 2014-05-14 Last updated: 2014-09-29Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

Magister essay Anna Panoyan(647 kB)150 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 647 kBChecksum SHA-512
c910f83f927dbb24269f991c03626548108ecbf1380477faf7a2c372274a57e452514612a6a71c5c95fc55723915c73096a9e2bf83ebed8bb67b39883f2aaf76
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Department of English
Languages and Literature

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 150 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 161 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf