Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Realizing the Single Software Market: Cross-National Validity of Software License Agreements
Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law.
2014 (English)Doctoral thesis, monograph (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

The Internet has revolutionized the software industry, one of the world’s largest businesses. A single software market is emerging, independent of national borders, where products and services are digitally distributed. But the legal framework for software transfers is not geographically independent; relevant underlying law varies substantially between different legal systems.

In this doctoral thesis, cross-national validity of certain standard software license agreements is examined as a solution to overcome national differences and improve the emerging single software market. Cross-national validity is mapped, explained, and improved under American and German law. The United States and the European Union collectively dominate the single software market. Within the EU, Germany is the most relevant legal system, and many conclusions reached under German law can be extended to the entire EU.

The study identifies many current issues, caused by inter alia inherent limits of law, fundamental differences between German and American law, and problematic transferor choices. Current issues exist regarding formation, substantive content, and interpretation of software license agreements on a cross-national level. This leads to increasing legal and practical problems for the industry and individual transferors.

Major and minor improvements in software license agreements and business models are suggested to achieve cross-national validity. Simple advice includes better assent mechanisms, prior disclosure, clear notice, and translating software license agreements. More comprehensive advice includes focusing on provisions that are essential from a business or technical perspective, rethinking certain business and technical choices that might lead to legal problems, making compromises over certain provisions that have only minor legal advantages but clear legal disadvantages, and choosing a way to bridge or avoid national differences regarding central provisions and practices from among available suggestions adapted to different business models.

Making such improvements is becoming increasingly important as lawmakers and consumer associations in different countries become ever more active, and as developing countries become increasingly important. Improving cross-national validity will enhance legal certainty and bring us one step closer to realizing the single software market.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Uppsala: Iustus förlag, 2014. , 627 p.
Skrifter från Juridiska institutionen vid Umeå universitet, ISSN 1404-9198 ; 31
Keyword [en]
IT law, comparative law, United States law, German law, contract law, copyright law, competition law, data privacy law, private lawmaking, software license agreements, cross-national validity, single software market
National Category
Law (excluding Law and Society)
Research subject
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-88724ISBN: 978-91-7678-888-2 (print)OAI: diva2:716948
Public defence
2014-06-05, Samhällsvetarhuset, S 205h, Umeå universitet, Umeå, 10:15 (English)
Available from: 2014-05-15 Created: 2014-05-13 Last updated: 2014-05-28Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(6492 kB)