Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Back to the Merton ideals? Corporate fraud, scientific dishonesty, and the need to reform academic institutions and identity
Linköping University, Department of Management and Engineering, Project management, Innovations and Entrepreneurship . Linköping University, The Institute of Technology.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3863-1073
Linköping University, Department of Management and Engineering, Project management, Innovations and Entrepreneurship . Linköping University, The Institute of Technology.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4233-5138
2013 (English)In: 35th DRUID Celebration Conference 2013, proceeding, Druid Web , 2013Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

For a long time, plagiarism and data manipulation have been dealt with as serious issues in science and medicine.  Reluctantly, academic dishonesty and manipulation are also becoming important issues in social sciences, with prestigious journals recently retracting several published and highly cited papers. This paper provides statistics on retracted papers during the last 12 years in management and economics as reported in several comprehensive databases, Ebsco Business Source Premier, Emerald, JSTOR, ScienceDirect, Springer, Taylor & Francis Online and  Wiley Online Library and analyzes which, if any,  explicit policies journals have formulated in this area. Drawing on recent analyses of persistent corporate fraud, the paper discusses the role of similar mechanisms for the non-discovery of academic fraud, such as institutional endorsement and ascription, fragmented control and mimetic herding. This analysis is related to current forms of academic identity construction, where publications outlets and numbers trump substance, and referencing is more important than reading or reflecting.  The paper ends with a menu of possible remedies, from journal policies and the practices of employment committees to the everyday actions of individual academics.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Druid Web , 2013.
Keyword [en]
Plagiarism, Academic Dishonesty, Retraction, Institutional analysis, Corporate fraud, Academic identity
National Category
Business Administration
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-106552OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-106552DiVA: diva2:716514
Conference
35th DRUID Celebration Conference 2013, Barcelona, Spain, June 17-19, 2013
Available from: 2014-05-09 Created: 2014-05-09 Last updated: 2014-05-20Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

Karabag and Berggren (Back to the Merton Ideal)(553 kB)272 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 553 kBChecksum SHA-512
f78504d2a3bcc5a70e5b495e0b92c58cc363afacc993370f86ed74925d5f2d43f9b10db94ab1cd46382cc5af0e4940ae0f3f15f870f64fc994be035c1ed17bcf
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Karabag, Solmaz FilizBerggren, Christian
By organisation
Project management, Innovations and Entrepreneurship The Institute of Technology
Business Administration

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 272 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 393 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf