Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Examensarbetet – en kvalitetsindikator inom högre utbildning?: exemplet högskoleingenjörsutbildning
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Educational Sciences, Department of Education.
2014 (Swedish)Doctoral thesis, monograph (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

This thesis focuses on the concept of quality in higher education, more particularly quality of the degree project. The overarching issue is whether an assessment of the quality of a degree project can be used for evaluating the quality of the entire programme where it forms a part. The subject is partly initiated by the design of the quality evaluation system in Sweden introduced in 2011, in which a quality indicator function of the degree projects is vital.

The notion of quality in degree projects is analyzed through three perspectives – as articulated in the research literature, as stated in the policy documents and curriculum documents regarding a Swedish engineering programme, and as experienced by the actors – examiners and supervisors – of this same programme. If the three perspectives testify with reasonably equal meaning to the concept of quality, an indicator function of degree projects can be considered appropriate.

Different methods have been combined. The policy documents are investigated by a qualitative and quantitative textual analysis, while the perceptions of the examiners and supervisors are explored by in-depth interviews. Results are interpreted by using an arena concept proposed by Lindensjö & Lundgren, and an analysis system suggested by Bernstein.

The results show that quality of a degree project is an ambiguous notion, and that different aspects of quality are reflected in the three perspectives. The conclusion is that assuming a quality indicator function of a degree project is problematic and not self-evident.

In a formal sense, the degree project course is clearly separated from other modules of the programme, i.e. it is strongly classified. At the same time it is weakly framed and the actors feel near-total freedom in implementing it.

Conceivable consequences of the evaluation system used in Sweden since 2011 are also discussed. Uniformity in the design of the degree project course can be expected, as well as undervaluation of the conditions for the programme and the teaching processes of it.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis, 2014. , 210 p.
Uppsala Studies in Education, ISSN 0347-1314 ; 135
Keyword [en]
degree project, engineering programme, evaluation, higher education, quality indicator
National Category
Educational Sciences
Research subject
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-218775ISBN: 978-91-554-8893-2OAI: diva2:699809
Public defence
2014-04-10, Zootissalen, Evolutionsbiologiskt centrum, Norbyv. 18 D, 752 36 Uppsala, Uppsala, 13:00 (Swedish)
Available from: 2014-03-20 Created: 2014-02-17 Last updated: 2014-07-21Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1846 kB)2193 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1846 kBChecksum SHA-512
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf
Buy this publication >>

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Svärd, Ola
By organisation
Department of Education
Educational Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 2193 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Total: 1418 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link