Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Well Integrity behind casing during well operation.Alternative sealing materials to cement
Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Engineering Science and Technology, Department of Petroleum Engineering and Applied Geophysics.
2013 (English)MasteroppgaveStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

Maintaining well integrity during all well operations has become a major concern for operators worldwide. The maintenance of an increasingly aging well stock and the higher cost associated with new wells makes well integrity a critical element of asset lifecycle management. Factors such as wellbore instability, corrosion, cement bond deterioration, expansion/contraction, and changing pressure envelopes to name a few, all contribute to compromised well integrity. Therefore, assessing the integrity of existing wellbores is crucial for optimizing productivity and adding value. For an oil/gas well to maintain its integrity and be produced effectively and economically, it is pertinent that a complete zonal isolation is achieved through out the life of the well. This complete zonal isolation, however, can be compromised due to factors that come into play during the operative life of the completed well. There has been a lot of research and experimental investigations in the area of well cement design and this has led to improved cement designs and cementing practices but yet many cement integrity problems persist and this further strengthens the need to evaluate alternative sealing materials to cement. This thesis work describes the process criteria and consideration of design of wellbore seals to establish well integrity behind casing. In order to improve the primary cementing, alternative materials to cement was evaluated. An assessment of ThermaSet and Sandaband was conducted with the emphasis on applicability, placement and zonal isolation. The assessment of the materials showed potential in both Sandaband and ThermaSet. Even though both materials had properties which made them good for long lasting isolation, cement will still be the only material for cementing in the near future. This is because of the superior ability to support the casing, the diversity of cement, low cost of the material and due to the state of the industry. The property of the alternative materials makes them possible candidates for future corrosion and temperature fluctuating wells. Sandaband can also be used as isolation behind the casing in shallow gas wells. The usage of Sandaband will be limited to simple well solution because of the complexity of the operation. ThermaSet is currently too expensive, and there are too many untested issues related to it as a primary cementing material. It is recommended that the design and material selection for sealing casing in wellbores be site specific. Evaluation of sealing effectiveness should be made on the entire seal system i.e. seal, seal-rock interface and the surrounding rock. Consequently, the experimental work presents a detailed investigation of the physical and chemical capabilities of barite loaded mud as a reliable alternative to cement as a sealing material. In order to verify how capable barite loaded mud is as an alternative to cement, a laboratory experiment that gave data as to the shear strength of the mud, how it could be handled to ensure that a long plug with high solids concentration is created, its gel strength, its density, setting time, filtration rate, and rheological parameters were studied. Comparisons were made of the test result with the properties of Portland cement. The test results showed slight agreement with the published properties of Portland cement. The results obtained from the study show that: At low mud rheology, barite loaded mud is pump-able since it pumps with gear pump at reduced pressure; too much water lowers slurry viscosity. This makes it easier to pump; however, it may lead to the following objectionable characteristics: longer setting time, reduction in ultimate strength of the cementing material. The effective density of a suitable barite loaded mud that can be used as a reliable alternative to Portland cement is 1.28kg/litre.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Institutt for petroleumsteknologi og anvendt geofysikk , 2013. , 82 p.
URN: urn:nbn:no:ntnu:diva-23939Local ID: ntnudaim:10217OAI: diva2:691814
Available from: 2014-01-28 Created: 2014-01-28 Last updated: 2014-01-28Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1492 kB)2520 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1492 kBChecksum SHA-512
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf
cover(184 kB)5 downloads
File information
File name COVER01.pdfFile size 184 kBChecksum SHA-512
Type coverMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Department of Petroleum Engineering and Applied Geophysics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 2520 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Total: 149 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link