Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Genus på lärarutbildningen: En komparativ analys mellan åren 2010-2013
Södertörn University, School of Culture and Education, Teacher Education.
2013 (Swedish)Independent thesis Advanced level (professional degree), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

It could be argued that theories about gender are something that should be a part of every upper secondary school teachers agenda (knowledge base), because the Swedish curriculum specifically says that schools must encourage and work for equal rights between men and women.The students are supposed tobe encouraged to develop their interest, without judgment, about what femininity and masculinity is.

This essay is aiming to find out how gender is used in the teacher program at Södertörns Högskola. The main focus of the essay is to see the possible differences between the curriculum of 2010 and 2013. Using quantitative and qualitative content analysis this essay is aiming to examine how gender words are used in the syllabus, study manuals and literature lists for Educational science A (2010) and Educational science I (2013). In what way are gendered terms, like boy, girl heterosexuality and man, part of the text material? Who is represented in the material? And are there any differences between 2010 and 2013?

The results show that there is a difference. In the earlier education more gender words are used than in the later. When gender words are explicit in the texts is it easier to work with, the texts has the power to judge what´s included and excluded in the program. When gender words are in ordered in bigger terms, like Interkulturalitet, is it easier to forget to discuss gender.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2013. , 37 p.
National Category
Educational Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-21504OAI: oai:DiVA.org:sh-21504DiVA: diva2:690537
Subject / course
Education Studies
Uppsok
Social and Behavioural Science, Law
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2014-01-24 Created: 2014-01-23 Last updated: 2014-01-24Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(760 kB)164 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 760 kBChecksum SHA-512
ee7f6a5bd348753a172bb51bc7cadeadab506ae02f871a68e2958d6929cdd600659cdb8c11c9ac55d7e97f99b28d2f463d9dceb22707ecea1ce1c7f65bafcaf5
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Teacher Education
Educational Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 164 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 98 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf