Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Köparens reklamationsrätt av jordbruksprodukter – En komparativ studie mellan KöpL, CISG och DCFR
Jönköping University, Jönköping International Business School, JIBS, Accounting and Law.
2013 (Swedish)Independent thesis Advanced level (degree of Master (Two Years)), 20 credits / 30 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

A large part of the agricultural products that are sold in Sweden are imported because Sweden cannot meet the consumers agriculture products demand all year around. One problem that can occur and become problematic when trading across boarders is if there are errors in the delivered agricultural products. What must the Swedish buyer do, for example, make for it to be considered complained fault in the goods against the seller? Another problem in international trade is that the buyer may need to apply complaint rules they have not previously been in contact with since their domestic law is not always applicable to the contract. To avoid getting into this situation, the buyer should try to negotiate with the seller that the contracting parties shall use compensation claim rules that the buyer is familiar with, or which is even more advantageous than to the seller. This so that the buyer is not likely to neglect their right to sanctions against the seller. Since there are many different compensations claim rules to choose from for a buyer, it will be investigated in this paper which of the complaint rules of KöpL, CISG and the DCFR that is most advantageous complaint claims for the buyer regarding complaints of agricultural products. The paper will discuss and compare the complaint rules in KöpL, CISG and the DCFR about the risk of agriculture products, the buyer's duty, the buyer’s complaint period and the content and form of a message. With the help of discussion, it will appear that the KöpL has the most advantageous compensation claim rules for the buyer when the buyer is complaining about the delivered agricultural products to the seller. This because KöpL is most beneficial for the buyer regarding when the risk of agricultural products shall be deemed to pass to the buyer and the criterion concerning the content of the buyer’s complaint.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Keyword [sv]
KöpL, CISG, DCFR, jordbruksprodukter, reklamationsrätt, köprätt, internationell handel
National Category
URN: urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-22932OAI: diva2:683171
Subject / course
IHH, Commercial Law
Available from: 2014-02-03 Created: 2014-01-02 Last updated: 2014-02-03Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

Köparens reklamationsrätt av jordbruksprodukter – En komparativ studie mellan KöpL, CISG och DCFR(645 kB)202 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT02.pdfFile size 645 kBChecksum SHA-512
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
JIBS, Accounting and Law

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 202 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Total: 246 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link