Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Artifactual evidence of discrimination in correspondence studies?: A replication of the Neumark method
Linnaeus University, School of Business and Economics, Department of Economics and Statistics. (Linnaeus University Centre for Labour Market and Discrimination Studies)ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5620-4745
Linnaeus University, School of Business and Economics, Department of Economics and Statistics. (Linnaeus University Centre for Labour Market and Discrimination Studies)ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6236-0197
Linnaeus University, School of Business and Economics, Department of Economics and Statistics. (Linnaeus University Centre for Labour Market and Discrimination Studies)
2013 (English)Report (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

The advocates of correspondence testing (CT) argue that it provide the most clear and convincing evidence of discrimination. The common view is that the standard CT can identify what is typically defined as discrimination in a legal sense – what we label total discrimination in the current study –, although it cannot separate between preferences and statistical discrimination. However, Heckman and Siegelman (1993) convincingly show that audit and correspondence studies can obtain biased estimates of total discrimination – in any direction – if employers evaluate applications according to some threshold level of productivity. This issue has essentially been ignored in the empirical literature on CT experiments until the appearance of the methodology proposed by Neumark (2012). He shows that with the right data and an identifying assumption, with testable predictions, this method can identify total discrimination. In the current paper we use this new method to reexamine a number of already published correspondence studies to investigate if their estimate of total discrimination is affected by group differences in variances of unobservable characteristics. We also aim at improving the general understanding of to what extent the standardization level of job applications is an issue in empirical work. We find that the standardization level of the job applications being set by the experimenter appear to be a general issue in correspondence studies which must be taken seriously

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Linnéuniversitetet , 2013. , 41 p.
Series
Working paper series / Linnaeus University Centre for Labour Market and Discrimination Studies, 2013:9
National Category
Social Sciences
Research subject
Economy, Economics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-31015OAI: oai:DiVA.org:lnu-31015DiVA: diva2:676800
Available from: 2013-12-06 Created: 2013-12-06 Last updated: 2017-02-17Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(390 kB)58 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 390 kBChecksum SHA-512
6643f083b5e8e968d0648f4d422ea8368156942c7ed9048c3fb29a4b60907adfa4e690c65c718d168a0826186d6d2c30b45da8f1c911b1ac8ca9790688d623ff
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

http://lnu.se/polopoly_fs/1.90916!/WP%202013%209.pdf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Carlsson, MagnusFumarco, LucaRooth, Dan-Olof
By organisation
Department of Economics and Statistics
Social Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 58 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 116 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf