Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Valuations of travel time variability in scheduling versus mean-variance models
KTH.
KTH.
KTH.
2012 (English)Report (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

The standard method of estimating the value of travel time variability for use in policy appraisal is to estimate the parameters of a reduced-form utility function, where some measure of travel time variability (such as the standard deviation) is included. A problem with this approach is that the obtained valuation will in general depend on the standardized travel time distribution, and hence cannot be transferred from one context to another. A recently suggested remedy of this problem has been to estimate a scheduling model, which in theory is transferrable, and use the implied reduced-form to derive valuations for use in appraisal. In this paper we estimate both a scheduling model and the implied reduced-form model, using stated choice data. The valuation of travel time variability implied by the scheduling model turns out to be substantially smaller than what is obtained from a reduced-form model estimated on the same sample. The results suggest that the scheduling model does not capture all of the disutility arising from travel time variability. Hence, although it can be shown that scheduling and reduced-form models are “theoretically equivalent”, that hypothesized equivalence is not reflected in the empirical evidence. We speculate that the derivation of reduced-form models from an underlying scheduling model omits two essential features: first, the notion of an exogenously fixed “preferred arrival time” neglects the fact that most activities can be rescheduled given full information about the travel times in advance, and second, disutility may be derived from uncertainty as such, in the form of anxiety, decisions costs or costs for having contingency plans. We also report our estimates of the valuation of travel time variability for public transit trips, for use in applied appraisal.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Stockholm: Statens väg- och transportforskningsinstitut, 2012. , 34 p.
Series
CTS Working Paper, 2012:2
Keyword [en]
Journey time, Variability, Delay, Reliability (stat), Value analysis, Stated preference, Passenger, Mathematical model, Experiment, Rail bound transport
Keyword [sv]
Restid, Föränderlighet, Förseningar, Reliabilitet, Värdeanalys, Stated preference, Passagerare, Matematiska modeller, Experiment, Järnvägstransporter
National Category
Economics
Research subject
Railway: General works, surveys, comprehensive works, Railway: Passenger transport
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:vti:diva-656OAI: oai:DiVA.org:vti-656DiVA: diva2:669351
Available from: 2013-12-03 Created: 2013-12-03 Last updated: 2014-06-09Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1148 kB)149 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1148 kBChecksum SHA-512
adc91a359c99f088b3b1d4847da7c8370bcba29e90d524f741964fb369bba71e3020e3faafa9ae4a383ba980b368b917b3df9a52d42c90e19cd6befd8e2f5c52
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Economics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 149 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 36 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf