Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Dissenting opinions in constitutional courts
Örebro University, School of Law, Psychology and Social Work, Örebro University, Sweden.
2013 (English)In: German Law Journal, ISSN 2071-8322, Vol. 14, no 8, 1345-1371 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Although long considered alien to the civil law tradition, the publication of separate dissenting or concurring opinions is now permitted by the majority of European constitutional courts, the only exceptions being the Austrian, Belgian, French, Italian, and Luxembourgish constitutional courts. The decades-long history of dissenting opinions in the practice of several European constitutional courts calls for an analysis.  While there is an extensive literature in the United States regarding the use of dissenting opinions, comprehensive empirical research is still absent in Europe.  American scholars have conducted research from several different points of view. Legal scholars have dealt primarily with the relationship between dissenting opinions and the doctrine of binding precedent, and have tried to solve the problem of the precedential value of plurality decisions, e.g. decisions lacking a reasoning shared by the majority of the judges.  Political scientists, for their part, have studied the policy-making role of judges and strategic opinion-writing.  Scholars of law and economics have analyzed the costs and benefits of writing separately.  Even judges themselves have often expressed their own thoughts in essays or conference speeches on the matter.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2013. Vol. 14, no 8, 1345-1371 p.
Keyword [en]
Comparative law. Dissenting opinions, Judicial opinions, Judicial independence, Separate opinions
National Category
Law (excluding Law and Society)
Research subject
Law; Legal Science; Constitutional Law
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-32286OAI: diva2:662804

Special Issue of the German Law Journal on 'Constitutional Reasoning'

The article was commented by Prof. Hjalte Rasmussen and Louise Nan Rasmussen in the same issue:

Available from: 2013-11-08 Created: 2013-11-08 Last updated: 2013-11-11Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

Kelemen-Dissenting Opinions(655 kB)291 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 655 kBChecksum SHA-512
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links


Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Kelemen, Katalin
By organisation
School of Law, Psychology and Social Work, Örebro University, Sweden
In the same journal
German Law Journal
Law (excluding Law and Society)

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 291 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Total: 237 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link