Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Environmental, biological and anthropogenic effects on grizzly bear body size: temporal and spatial considerations
Show others and affiliations
2013 (English)In: BMC Ecology, ISSN 1472-6785, Vol. 13, 31- p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: Individual body growth is controlled in large part by the spatial and temporal heterogeneity of, and competition for, resources. Grizzly bears (Ursus arctos L.) are an excellent species for studying the effects of resource heterogeneity and maternal effects (i.e. silver spoon) on life history traits such as body size because their habitats are highly variable in space and time. Here, we evaluated influences on body size of grizzly bears in Alberta, Canada by testing six factors that accounted for spatial and temporal heterogeneity in environments during maternal, natal and 'capture' (recent) environments. After accounting for intrinsic biological factors (age, sex), we examined how body size, measured in mass, length and body condition, was influenced by: (a) population density; (b) regional habitat productivity; (c) inter-annual variability in productivity (including silver spoon effects); (d) local habitat quality; (e) human footprint (disturbances); and (f) landscape change. Results: We found sex and age explained the most variance in body mass, condition and length (R-2 from 0.48-0.64). Inter-annual variability in climate the year before and of birth (silver spoon effects) had detectable effects on the three-body size metrics (R-2 from 0.04-0.07); both maternal (year before birth) and natal (year of birth) effects of precipitation and temperature were related with body size. Local heterogeneity in habitat quality also explained variance in body mass and condition (R-2 from 0.01-0.08), while annual rate of landscape change explained additional variance in body length (R-2 of 0.03). Human footprint and population density had no observed effect on body size. Conclusions: These results illustrated that body size patterns of grizzly bears, while largely affected by basic biological characteristics (age and sex), were also influenced by regional environmental gradients the year before, and of, the individual's birth thus illustrating silver spoon effects. The magnitude of the silver spoon effects was on par with the influence of contemporary regional habitat productivity, which showed that both temporal and spatial influences explain in part body size patterns in grizzly bears. Because smaller bears were found in colder and less-productive environments, we hypothesize that warming global temperatures may positively affect body mass of interior bears.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2013. Vol. 13, 31- p.
Keyword [en]
Bear, Silver spoon, Environmental effects, GPS radiocollar, Temporal and spatial heterogeneity
National Category
Natural Sciences
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-210241DOI: 10.1186/1472-6785-13-31ISI: 000325253700001OAI: diva2:661952
Available from: 2013-11-05 Created: 2013-11-04 Last updated: 2013-11-05Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1499 kB)47 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1499 kBChecksum SHA-512
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Shafer, Aaron B. A.
By organisation
Evolutionary Biology
In the same journal
BMC Ecology
Natural Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 47 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 234 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link