Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Determination of the piston velocity for water-air interfaces using flux chambers, acoustic Doppler velocimetry, and IR imaging of the water surface
Linköping University, The Tema Institute, Department of Water and Environmental Studies. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1107-3929
Linköping University, The Tema Institute, Department of Water and Environmental Studies. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.
University of Gothenburg, Sweden.
University of Gothenburg, Sweden.
2013 (English)In: Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, ISSN 2169-8953, Vol. 118, no 2, 770-782 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The transport of gasses dissolved in surface waters across the water-atmosphere interface is controlled by the piston velocity (k). This coefficient has large implications for, e.g., greenhouse gas fluxes but is challenging to quantify in situ. At present, empirical k-wind speed relationships from a small number of studies and systems are often extrapolated without knowledge of model performance. This study compares empirical k estimates from flux chamber and surface water gas concentration measurements (chamber method), eddy cell modeling and dissipation rates of turbulent kinetic energy (dissipation method), and a surface divergence method based on IR imaging, at a fetch limited coastal observation station. We highlight strengths and weaknesses of the methods, and relate measured k values to parameters such as wave height, and surface skin velocities. The chamber and dissipation methods yielded k values in the same order of magnitude over a 24 h period with varying wind conditions (up to 10 m s−1, closest weather station) and wave heights (0.01–0.30 m). The surface divergence method most likely did not resolve the small turbulent eddies that cause the main divergence. Flux chamber estimates showed the largest temporal variability, with lower k values than the dissipation method during calm conditions, where the dissipation method failed as waves and instrument noise dominated over the turbulence signal. There was a strong correspondence between k from chambers, the RMS of surface velocities from IR imaging, and wave height. We propose a method to estimate area integrated values of k from wave measurements.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
American Geophysical Union (AGU) , 2013. Vol. 118, no 2, 770-782 p.
Keyword [en]
gas exchange coefficient, IR imaging, flux chamber, acoustic doppler velocimetry, surface divergence, piston velocity
National Category
Earth and Related Environmental Sciences
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-100322DOI: 10.1002/jgrg.20064ISI: 000324913100029OAI: diva2:661469

Funding Agencies|Swedish Research Council||

Available from: 2013-11-04 Created: 2013-11-04 Last updated: 2016-05-04

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1870 kB)450 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1870 kBChecksum SHA-512
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Gålfalk, MagnusBastviken, David
By organisation
Department of Water and Environmental StudiesFaculty of Arts and Sciences
Earth and Related Environmental Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 450 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 202 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link