Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Life cycle assessment of novel CCS technologies
Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Engineering Science and Technology, Department of Energy and Process Engineering.
2013 (English)MasteroppgaveStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

CO2 emissions from the combustion of fossil fuels are the largest sources of anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions to the atmosphere. Carbon capture and storage (CCS) is one of the better options to mitigate these emissions and thereby limit global warming even while continuing the use of fossil fuels for power generation. As CCS increases the energy consumption of the power plant itself, there will be an increased use of fuel and therefore also increased environmental impacts connected to this. To calculate these impacts it is important to include the entire supply chain and life cycle of the power plant. This thesis involves a tiered hybrid life cycle assessment of natural gas- and coal power plants with chilled ammonia process (CAP) and sorption enhanced water-gas shift (SEWGS) capture technologies. These novel capture technologies are two of the least studied when it comes to environmental assessments. The results from this assessment are compared to two of the more studied capture technologies, post-combustion capture by monoethanolamine (MEA) and oxyfuel combustion capture. Both the CAP capture alternative and the SEWGS alternative have been shown to decrease the global warming potential (GWP) in a natural gas plant by 70%. For the coal-fired power plants, the CAP technology managed a decrease in GWP of 77% while the SEWGS technology showed a decrease of 77.5%. This decrease comes at a cost of other impact categories where for example the freshwater ecotoxicity potential (FETP) has an increase of 87-88% for both the CAP and SEWGS capture technologies in NGCC plants. This impact category has an increase of 25 and 22% for the CAP and SEWGS technologies in the coal-fired power plants. Compared to post-combustion capture by MEA and oxyfuel combustion capture, the results were clear on MEA being the least preferable option in an environmental perspective for both coal- and natural gas-fired power plants. Oxyfuel combustion capture, on the other hand, was shown to be the most preferable option.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Institutt for energi- og prosessteknikk , 2013. , 72 p.
URN: urn:nbn:no:ntnu:diva-22885Local ID: ntnudaim:10130OAI: diva2:654866
Available from: 2013-10-08 Created: 2013-10-08 Last updated: 2013-10-08Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(2603 kB)465 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 2603 kBChecksum SHA-512
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf
cover(387 kB)18 downloads
File information
File name COVER01.pdfFile size 387 kBChecksum SHA-512
Type coverMimetype application/pdf
attachment(14729 kB)1979 downloads
File information
File name ATTACHMENT01.zipFile size 14729 kBChecksum SHA-512
Type attachmentMimetype application/zip

By organisation
Department of Energy and Process Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 465 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Total: 151 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link