Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Enhetstestning: Kostnad mot kvalitet
Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Informatics.
2013 (Swedish)Independent thesis Basic level (degree of Bachelor), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

Unit testing is a type of testing technique which is becoming quite fashionable to the developers and companies that are in the business of creating and managing software. Alas there are seldom any concrete data to support the positive claims of the authors in unit testing methodology books. These claims are instead based on empirical studies and the experience of the authors. The problem that arises from this situation is that it becomes problematic for managers and also the developers themselves to convince both customers and their own management to use this type of testing as there is no exact return of investment model. This essay examines this problem from two points, the first point is from the literature itself and interviews conducted with a number of developers at a software company located in Umea, Sweden. The second point is to compare the experiences from the developers to actual studies conducted about unit testing. The purpose of this comparison is to try and evaluate if unit testing is a cost effective activity. The results of the study are not conclusive as there are no or too few studies that evaluate unit testing from a total cost perspective. Instead the compared studies are mostly concerned with the fewer errors and error prevention that unit testing brings to the software project. The aspect of software quality and the increased manageability that comes with unit testing seems to have a lower priority in this research field. It’s the researcher’s opinion that a broader view of unit testing can create the solid arguments that the managers and developers need. Although the results are inconclusive certain positive tendencies can be observed, more studies with this broader perspective are required in order to evaluate unit testing from a total cost perspective, not only from an error prevention perspective.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2013. , 28 p.
Series
Informatik Student Paper Bachelor (INFSPB), 2013.29
Keyword [sv]
Enhetstestning
National Category
Information Systems, Social aspects
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-80848OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-80848DiVA: diva2:651674
External cooperation
Presentation
2013-09-12, 13:15 (Swedish)
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2013-09-27 Created: 2013-09-26 Last updated: 2013-11-07Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

Enhetstestning: kostnad mot kvalitet(740 kB)456 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 740 kBChecksum SHA-512
0f731a7bdae884311657cb74aca24b84c3119ae81c3ea9dd2c94e72771e5ce2efc945d33a125104f8d311836c8977c041d0d31d6e9d2628fb5e16febe8c2c9e3
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Department of Informatics
Information Systems, Social aspects

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 456 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 885 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf