Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The Effects of GUI on Users’ Creative Performance in Computerized Drawing
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Informatics and Media, Human-Computer Interaction.
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Informatics and Media, Human-Computer Interaction.
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Informatics and Media, Human-Computer Interaction.
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Informatics and Media, Human-Computer Interaction.
Show others and affiliations
2013 (English)In: Proceedings of MIDI '13: Proceedings of the International Conference on Multimedia, Interaction, Design and Innovation, New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery (ACM), 2013, 142-151 p.Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

This paper presents the results of an empirical comparative study investigating how the outcomes of a computerized figural creativity test are affected when the participants use two different versions of the Graphical User Interface (GUI) on a mouse-operated desktop PC. The results show that participants get insignificantly lower creativity scores with the elaborated GUI, contrary to the GUI that has no visual artifacts available and offers more similar user experience to pen and paper, even though they spend significantly more time on drawing with the elaborated one. That phenomenon is expected to contribute to the cumulative effect of GUI and input method noticed by previous research. That implies that creative drawing and testing should be carefully introduced into computer-based environments.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery (ACM), 2013. 142-151 p.
Keyword [en]
Mouse, Graphical User Interface, GUI, evaluation, comparison, creativity, test, TTCT, figural, drawing
National Category
Human Computer Interaction
Research subject
Human-Computer Interaction
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-207261DOI: 10.1145/2500342.2500360ISBN: 978-1-4503-2303-1 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-207261DiVA: diva2:647409
Conference
International Conference on Multimedia, Interaction, Design and Innovation MIDI '13, 24-25 June, 2013, Warsaw, Poland
Available from: 2013-09-11 Created: 2013-09-11 Last updated: 2013-09-11Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(485 kB)225 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT03.pdfFile size 485 kBChecksum SHA-512
f279aa6ea12df11820b96530517d9770c9c41ee0b31143418034224661d2ebdb7c9cd0aad7fb6273c6097884075ffbf1731950872e0c00f002edb17463415381
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textThe ACM Digital Library

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Zabramski, Stanislaw
By organisation
Human-Computer Interaction
Human Computer Interaction

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 227 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 504 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf