Insights from Implementing a System for Peer-Review
2013 (English)In: IEEE Transactions on Education, ISSN 0018-9359, Vol. 56, no 3, 261-267 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Courses at the Master’s level in automatic control and signal processing cover mathematical theories and algorithms for control, estimation, and filtering. However, giving students practical experience in how to use these algorithms is also an important part of these courses. A goal is that the students should not only be able to understand and derive these algorithms, but also be able to apply them to real-life technical problems. The latter is achieved by assigning more time to the laboratory tutorials and designing them in such a way that the exercises are open for interpretation; an example of this would be giving the students more freedom to decide how to acquire the data needed to solve the given exercises.The students are asked to hand in a laboratory report in which they describe how they solved the exercises. This paper presents a double-blind peer-review process for laboratory reports, introduced at the Department of Electrical Engineering, Linköping University, Sweden. A survey was administered to students, and the results are summarized in this paper. Also discussed are the teachers’ experiences of peer review and of how students perform later in their education in writing their Master’s theses.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2013. Vol. 56, no 3, 261-267 p.
Critical thinking, laboratory work, peer assessment, student learning, peer review, student self-assessment, team-based projects
IdentifiersURN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-96893DOI: 10.1109/TE.2012.2211876ISI: 000322657200002OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-96893DiVA: diva2:643738