Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Fildelning: Avvägningen mellan upphovsrätt och integritetsskydd
Jönköping University, Jönköping International Business School.
2013 (Swedish)Independent thesis Advanced level (professional degree), 20 credits / 30 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

The relation between copyright and the right to privacy is complex and difficulties exist in balancing the rights. Copyright should not be limited. Therefore, to ensure the economic rights of the copyright owners, must the right to privacy instead be limited whenever the two rights collide.

The implementation of IPRED into Swedish Law meant a vast change as private operators are able to request information concerning a suspected infringer before as well as during a proceeding concerning an infringement of intellectual property. The chosen implementation method goes beyond IPRED’s requirements and also sanctions a lower standard of proof to grant the requested information. These deviations have given rise to critique whether the implementation is consistent and in accordance with EU-legislation. The court ruled in the ePhone case that providing a copyright owner with a suspected infringer’s information before prosecution is in accordance with EU-legislation. The motivation was that the Swedish court makes a proportionality assessment before granting the requested information. This ruling can be considered to close the discussion whether or not the European Convention on Human rights can be limited in favor of copyright.

The author’s suggestion of an alternative implementation of IPRED gives, in theory, rise to a better balance between both sides interests, where integrity would not be affected by as an extensive restriction. However, in reality, there are factors limiting copyright via such an implementation. Therefore the balance would shift as copyright owners would not possess the same possibilities to protect and defend their rights. The author therefore concludes that the preferred implementation is the currently established implementation. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2013. , 60 p.
Keyword [sv]
EU-rätt, immaterialrätt, upphovsrätt, informationsföreläggande, fildelning
National Category
Law
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-21772OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hj-21772DiVA: diva2:641611
Subject / course
IHH, Commercial Law
Available from: 2013-10-29 Created: 2013-08-19 Last updated: 2013-10-29Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(530 kB)236 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 530 kBChecksum SHA-512
4c72620344b0d90e6bbc481fe617c96253bdd0afa9678d1576e4e6d24492ef16a6bf6cc886e909969a144c8de5efa99f9f24826d490650b207fa989f233227f2
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Jönköping International Business School
Law

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 236 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 297 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf