Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
The effects of psychological treatment in primary care in Sweden—A practice-based study
Linköping University, Department of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Psychology. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.
Linköping University, Department of Behavioural Sciences and Learning. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.
Linköping University, Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Division of Nursing Science. Linköping University, Faculty of Health Sciences.
2014 (English)In: Nordic Journal of Psychiatry, ISSN 0803-9488, E-ISSN 1502-4725, Vol. 68, no 3, 204-212 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: Practice-based studies have found substantial effects of psychological treatment in routine care, often equivalent between treatment methods. Factors that moderate treatment outcome may be important to assess.

Aim: The purpose of this study was to evaluate treatment outcome in psychological treatment in primary care, and to compare outcome between the most frequently used methods. An additional aim was to study factors that might moderate outcome differences.

Method: The Clinical Outcome in Routine Evaluation (CORE) system was used to evaluate psychological treatment at Swedish primary care centers. Treatment methods were coded by the therapists after treatment. Three major treatment orientations-directive (cognitive, behavioral and CBT), reflective (psychodynamic and relational) and supportive therapy were compared. Patient and therapist variables were studied as treatment moderating factors.

Results: Analyses of 733 therapies, delivered by 70 therapists, showed good results in short psychological treatments (median session number = 6). Forty-three percent of the patients were remitted, 34% recovered. For patients receiving at least five sessions, the figures were 50% and 40%. Directive therapy and reflective therapy had comparable outcome, and better than supportive treatment. Patients in supportive therapy had higher age and received fewer therapy sessions. The patients' motivation, alliance capacity and reflective ability, as rated by the therapist after treatment, were lower for patients in supportive treatment.

Conclusions: Psychological treatment in primary care obtains god results. Supportive therapy should be studied more systematically, particularly with regard to variables that may moderate treatment outcome.


Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Informa Healthcare, 2014. Vol. 68, no 3, 204-212 p.
Keyword [en]
Patient moderator variables, Practice-based study, Psychological treatment, Supportive therapy
National Category
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-96060DOI: 10.3109/08039488.2013.797023ISI: 000333040700008PubMedID: 23758533OAI: diva2:640700
Available from: 2013-08-14 Created: 2013-08-14 Last updated: 2014-04-17

Open Access in DiVA

The effect of psychological treatment(556 kB)776 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 556 kBChecksum SHA-512
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Holmqvist, RolfStröm, ThomasFoldemo, Anniqa
By organisation
PsychologyFaculty of Arts and SciencesDepartment of Behavioural Sciences and LearningDivision of Nursing ScienceFaculty of Health Sciences
In the same journal
Nordic Journal of Psychiatry

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 776 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 139 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link