Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Validity and reliability testing of the Swedish version of Melbourne Decision Making Questionnaire
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Nursing.
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Nursing.
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Nursing.
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Nursing.
2014 (English)In: Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, ISSN 0283-9318, E-ISSN 1471-6712, Vol. 28, no 2, 405-412 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

BACKGROUND: The Melbourne Decision-Making Questionnaire (MDMQ) is an attempt to capture and measure coping strategies that people use. The instrument had not previously been translated into Swedish. The aim of this study was to evaluate validity and reliability of the Swedish version of the MDMQ.

METHOD: A Swedish translation was performed and back-translated. A group of five pilot readers evaluated content validity. The translated questionnaire was tested among 735 patients, healthcare workers, healthcare students and teachers. A parallel analysis (PA), exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were performed.

RESULT: An initial EFA with a four-factor solution showed a low concordance with the original 22-item four-factor model with a very low Cronbach's alpha in one of the dimensions. However, a second EFA with a three-factor solution showed a good model fit for the Swedish translation of the Melbourne Decision-Making Questionnaire (MDMQ-S) with a satisfactory Cronbach's alpha. A CFA showed a goodness of fit after deleting six items.

CONCLUSION: After testing the MDMQ-S, we found support for validity and reliability of the instrument. We found the 16-item version of MDMQ-S to be satisfactory concerning the subscales vigilance, procrastination and buck-passing. However, we found no support that the hypervigilance dimension could be measured by the MDMQ-S.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
John Wiley & Sons, 2014. Vol. 28, no 2, 405-412 p.
Keyword [en]
Confirmatory factor analysis, coping, decision-making, exploratory factor analysis, parallel analysis, reproducibility of results, reliability, validity
National Category
Nursing
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-74487DOI: 10.1111/scs.12052ISI: 000334503400023PubMedID: 23647465OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-74487DiVA: diva2:634463
Available from: 2013-07-01 Created: 2013-07-01 Last updated: 2017-12-06Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(357 kB)756 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 357 kBChecksum SHA-512
a92cb13570f2e0896c85206074d89a8eea7f4eac0e8aab97520388d244a1c538cc6f94cd41cde18c534676a2d560b6ac1e944d40b2074e0e4245e6e9478adeb7
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Isaksson, UlfHajdarevic, SenadaJutterström, LenaHörnsten, Åsa
By organisation
Department of Nursing
In the same journal
Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences
Nursing

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 756 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 306 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf