Change search

Cite
Citation style
• apa
• ieee
• modern-language-association-8th-edition
• vancouver
• Other style
More styles
Language
• de-DE
• en-GB
• en-US
• fi-FI
• nn-NO
• nn-NB
• sv-SE
• Other locale
More languages
Output format
• html
• text
• asciidoc
• rtf
Mathematical Analysis of Peformance Fees with High-Water Mark
KTH, School of Industrial Engineering and Management (ITM), Industrial Economics and Management (Dept.).
2013 (English)Independent thesis Advanced level (degree of Master (Two Years)), 20 credits / 30 HE creditsStudent thesisAlternative title
##### Abstract [en]

Abstract

Purpose –

The purpose of this thesis is to give the investors a better understanding on how to

interpret the costs of funds with performance fee with high-water mark and give some guidelines

when comparing funds with different fee structures, i.e. mutual funds and hedge funds.

Mathematical approaches –

Two mathematical approaches are used in the study. The first

approach is to describe the high-water mark contract as a partial differential equation, which has

the characteristics of Black-Scholes equation. The second approach is to numerically simulate

the evolution of a fund’s value. During the development of the fund’s value the cost of the fees

are calculated and discounted.

Findings

– It is found that the expected cost of the performance fee with high-water mark, vary

a lot. An example is when the volatility increases the expected cost of performance fee

drastically raises while the management fee is unchanged. Another interesting finding is that the

order of when the fees’ are charged affects the expected cost of the performance fee.

Conclusion

– The guidelines for the investor is to invest in a fund with a performance fee in low

volatile markets and a fund with just the management fee in high volatile markets. Another

impact is the time step which the high-water mark level is controlled. The investor wants these

controls as infrequently as possible. If the controls are done at a daily basis the expected cost of

the performance fee is higher than in a monthly control. It is also concluded that the Normanbelopp

of a fund with a performance fee should not be trusted.

Key-words:

2013. , p. 66
##### Keyword [en]
High-water mark, Performance fee, Management fee, Hedge fund
##### National Category
Mathematical Analysis
##### Identifiers
OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-124075DiVA, id: diva2:632590
##### Educational program
Master of Science in Engineering - Industrial Engineering and Management
##### Examiners
Available from: 2013-12-20 Created: 2013-06-25 Last updated: 2013-12-20Bibliographically approved

#### Open Access in DiVA

##### File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 922 kBChecksum SHA-512
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

#### Search in DiVA

##### By author/editor
Karlström, Viktor
##### By organisation
Industrial Economics and Management (Dept.)
##### On the subject
Mathematical Analysis

#### Search outside of DiVA

The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available
urn-nbn

#### Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 202 hits

Cite
Citation style
• apa
• ieee
• modern-language-association-8th-edition
• vancouver
• Other style
More styles
Language
• de-DE
• en-GB
• en-US
• fi-FI
• nn-NO
• nn-NB
• sv-SE
• Other locale
More languages
Output format
• html
• text
• asciidoc
• rtf
v. 2.33.0
|