Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Taiwan, South Korea, and Singapore: Comparing Theories of Democratization
Halmstad University, School of Social and Health Sciences (HOS).ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5217-6751
2013 (English)Independent thesis Basic level (degree of Bachelor), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

Democratization is a phenomenon which we have seen in many parts of the world. This thesis investigates the democratic processes in Taiwan and South Korea and looks at the reasons why Singapore did not democratize. It does so by comparing four theories of democratization. The first theory is the Modernization theory, in which economic development cause democracy. The Second is the Transition theory, in which deliberate elite decisions matter. The third used theory is the Structural theory, in which class struggles are emphasized. The final theory is the International Factors, which basically is an approach that looks at what international factors can help account for the occurred development. The method used is the Structured, Focused Comparison. Further, it is also a literature study, where the material analyzed is material written by renowned scholars within the field of democratization. This study finds that not any of these theories can explain democratization, but that they are all important factors when it comes to democratization, and can be used rather as tools than frameworks. However, it does acknowledge the need for all theories, but also argues for another set of factors that works as a compliment to the already established theories, such as legitimacy, in which the author argues that perhaps Singapore does not have to democratize because their rule seems to be legitimate by Singaporean people. It further builds to some extent on the current debate in democratization studies about universalism and sequentialism, where the author argues in favor of the universalists by showing why there are no preconditions.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2013. , 55 p.
National Category
Political Science
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hh:diva-23043OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hh-23043DiVA: diva2:631728
Subject / course
International Relations
Available from: 2013-07-04 Created: 2013-06-23 Last updated: 2013-07-04Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

Taiwan, South Korea, and Singapore Comparing Theories of Democratization(672 kB)425 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 672 kBChecksum SHA-512
3ef631131d9832bb6731fb20fa712d6feb55432af221e34c6912523ee00eb6401b9cb7bd332ef819f514644e44da7a65b6689908a52cd8abdada72bf1d0f3edf
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Ringstad, Albin
By organisation
School of Social and Health Sciences (HOS)
Political Science

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 425 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 674 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf