Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Optimal Inequality behind the Veil of How Should Commodities Be Taxed?: A Counterargument to the Recommendation in the Mirrlees Review
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Economics, Uppsala Center for Fiscal Studies.
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Economics, Uppsala Center for Fiscal Studies.
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Economics, Uppsala Center for Fiscal Studies. University of Tampere.
2013 (English)Report (Other academic)Alternative title
How Should Commodities Be Taxed? : A Counterargument to the Recommendation in the Mirrlees Review (English)
Abstract [en]

The Mirrlees Review recommends that commodity taxation should in general be uniform, but with some goods consumed in conjunction with labour supply (such as child care) left untaxed. This paper examines the validity of this claim in an optimal income tax framework. Contrary to the recommendation of the Review, our theoretical results imply that even if all goods other than the good needed for working are separable from leisure, the optimal tax on these goods should not be uniform. Instead, goods with larger expenditure elasticities should be discouraged relatively more by the tax system. If the government fully subsidises the cost of the good needed for working, then commodity taxation is uniform under the standard separability assumption. Our results imply that the optimal commodity tax system is dependent on the expenditure side of the government. A calibration exercise presented in the paper suggests that these results can be quantitatively important.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Uppsala: Department of Economics, Uppsala University , 2013. , 26 p.
Series
Working paper / Uppsala Center for Fiscal Studies, Uppsala University, 2013:5
Keyword [en]
income taxation, commodity taxation, public provision, separability
National Category
Economics
Research subject
Economics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-199496OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-199496DiVA: diva2:619690
Available from: 2013-05-06 Created: 2013-05-06 Last updated: 2015-06-30Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(700 kB)260 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 700 kBChecksum SHA-512
084b3c640eb0bac5fd18f4ec16fe0c3466a7ada883a2e82985a42c2f42d43d68584ebc7abb2923d1ffe22fd2c363ac9aa693c1e5a3dfc4be299e11d3ef2ac7e1
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Bastani, SpencerBlomquist, Sören
By organisation
Uppsala Center for Fiscal Studies
Economics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 260 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 500 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf