Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Written Feedback in English: Teachers' Practices and Cognition
Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Social Sciences and Technology Management, Program for Teacher Education.
2012 (English)Masteroppgave, 30 credits / 45 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

This study deals with written feedback on pupils’ written texts and teachers’ assessment practices and cognition. Providing effective, written feedback is a complex process that requires knowledge of the competency goal and development of methods for reducing the gap between pupil’s current status and pupil’s preferred state. Effective feedback is feedback that enhances pupils’ learning. In order to enhance learning feedback should contain information related to the following questions: "Where am I going?"; "How am I going?"; "Where to next?" The answers to these questions provide feed up, feed back and feed forward. The three questions must be connected in order to result in pupils’ greater achievement.

The data in this study consists of written feedback collected from teachers at an upper secondary school. The main objective of the study was to examine what kind of written feedback teachers provide to help their pupils further. The feedback texts were analyzed according to Kronholm-Cederberg’s Response Triangle, divided into global and local text levels, and the terms defined above. Eight semi-standardized interviews were also conducted in order to examine teachers’ assessment practices and cognition.

It is my experience that teachers’ responses contained elements at both the local and global text levels with the exception of context at the global level. In terms of the three questions mentioned above, most responses contained clear information about feed back and feed forward, however, there is a lack of feed up (goals) in most of the written feedback texts. This is unfortunate since feed up must be clear in order for pupils to develop further and increase their learning. This study also showed that teachers in general know much about assessment. However, there seems to be a tension between teachers’ knowledge and their practices. Teachers do not always tend to do what they know and believe.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
National Category
Subject didactics
URN: urn:nbn:no:ntnu:diva-20579OAI: diva2:613094
Social and Behavioural Science, Law
Available from: 2013-04-11 Created: 2013-03-26 Last updated: 2013-04-11Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltekst(1771 kB)334 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1771 kBChecksum SHA-512
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Program for Teacher Education
Subject didactics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 334 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Total: 83 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link