Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Setting priorities in primary health care - on whose conditions?: A questionnaire study
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Family Medicine and Preventive Medicine.
Show others and affiliations
2012 (English)In: BMC Family Practice, ISSN 1471-2296, E-ISSN 1471-2296, Vol. 13, 114- p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: In Sweden three key criteria are used for priority setting: severity of the health condition; patient benefit; and cost-effectiveness. They are derived from the ethical principles established by the Swedish parliament 1997 but have been used only to a limited extent in primary care. The aim of this study was to describe and analyse: 1) GPs', nurses', and patients' prioritising in routine primary care 2) The association between the three key priority setting criteria and the overall priority assigned by the GPs and nurses to individual patients. Methods: Paired questionnaires were distributed to all patients and the GPs or nurses they had contact with during a 2-week period at four health centres in Sweden. The staff registered the health conditions or health problem, and the planned intervention. Then they estimated the severity of the health condition, the expected patient benefit, and the cost-effectiveness of the planned intervention. Both the staff and the patients reported their overall prioritisation of the patient. In total, 1851 paired questionnaires were collected. Results: Compared to the medical staff, the patients assigned relatively higher priority to acute/minor conditions than to preventive check-ups for chronic conditions. Severity of the health condition was the priority setting criterion that had the strongest association with the overall priority for the staff as a whole, but for the GPs it was cost-effectiveness. Conclusions: The challenge for primary care providers is to balance the patients' demands with medical needs and cost-effectiveness. Transparent priority setting in primary care might contribute to a greater consensus between GPs and nurses on how to use the key priority setting criteria.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2012. Vol. 13, 114- p.
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-193038DOI: 10.1186/1471-2296-13-114ISI: 000312733800001OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-193038DiVA: diva2:602829
Available from: 2013-02-04 Created: 2013-01-28 Last updated: 2017-12-06Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(287 kB)100 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 287 kBChecksum SHA-512
5749ccdeab542f2b48c6a9e352985d2bbc2769883444a4d7d910e8e38622fcb1841b719c1267ef423aa9c833133fc50011f2b88804b4da19e68686fe6cb4a442
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records BETA

André, Malin

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
André, Malin
By organisation
Family Medicine and Preventive Medicine
In the same journal
BMC Family Practice
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 100 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 391 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf