Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
The Protection of children: the right to family right and how they can conflict.
Örebro University, School of Law, Psychology and Social Work, Örebro University, Sweden.
2013 (English)Independent thesis Advanced level (degree of Master (One Year)), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]


This paper examines the right to family life and how it can conflict with the child’s right to protection against harm. The paper examines how the international community views the family and what rights the family has in international law.  In addition to this, the paper also looks at the different family structure a family can have and it also examine whether there are a universal definition of family.

Furthermore, the paper also talks about the children and the rights afforded to them and how the rights has developed through time. The concept of childhood is a much-debated issue. There have been debates on when the childhood begins but also on when it ends and the views of the States differs somewhat. Childhood is a concept that is heavy with different psychological, physical, religious and cultural believes and practices. When the States was working on the Convention on the Rights of the Child they had to try to consolidate the different views on both the beginning and the end of childhood but it proved to be problematic. To say that the childhood began at conception would have made the convention incompatible with the national law that allows abortion and it could therefore risk that some States did not sign the convention. They therefore made a compromise that meant that the States could keep their own definition on the beginning of childhood.

The family as well as the well-being of the child is important and this is reflects in international law. This paper therefore also examines the articles in international and regional treaties concerning the family and the protection of the child.  It also examines several cases from the European Court of Human Rights to illustrate how the Court has reasoned in cases where rights of the parents has been in conflict with the children’s rights and best interest.

The conclusion drawn from this paper is that no set of rights weigh more than the other. They are both very important and if it is possible, the authorities shall try to balance them with each other. They have to have both what would be best for the child and the parents right to family life in mind. Even if the authorities have to remove a child from the parents care they need to have a reunification of the family as a ultimate goal to work towards. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2013. , 54 p.
Keyword [en]
Right to family life, Children's rights, Convention on the Rights of the Child, European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, European Court on Human Rights
National Category
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-27214ISRN: ORU-JPS/RÄ-AG-2013/0011--SEOAI: diva2:602306
Subject / course
2013-01-18, L2515, Fakultetsgatan 1 702 81, Örebro, 14:15 (English)
Social and Behavioural Science, Law
Available from: 2013-04-24 Created: 2013-01-31 Last updated: 2013-04-24Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1302 kB)247 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1302 kBChecksum SHA-512
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Sandin, Cimona
By organisation
School of Law, Psychology and Social Work, Örebro University, Sweden

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 247 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Total: 196 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link