Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Formativ bedömning - med samtalet som grund: En kvalitativ studie om lärares erfarenheter och tankar om bedömning
Södertörn University, School of Culture and Education, Teacher Education.
2012 (Swedish)Independent thesis Advanced level (professional degree), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

The purpose of this essay is to discover what Formative Assessment is used for in practice and also how teachers use the Curriculum for elementary school, preschool and after-school activity 2011 (Lgr 11) in their Formative Assessment work.

The questions are as follows:

  • What considerations do teachers take into account when assessing a student?
  • How do teachers view assessment for learning?
  • How do the teachers consider formative assessment works in relation to Lgr 11?

I have used a qualitative research method to answer my questions. I have interviewed five teachers regarding their view on and experience with assessment. Using a hermeneutic approach I have tried to retrieve a deeper meaning from my interviewees regarding formative assessment. I have approached formative assessment using the socio-cultural perspective because I believe it to be the best fit.

All of the informants believe formative assessment has made it easier to assess students and also that it works very well together with Lgr 11. A well done and effective formative assessment is always according to the teachers in the study based in the dialog and interaction with the student with-in the socio-cultural integration. The interaction between teacher and student is central to the success of his/her education. Through communication the teacher helps the student to understand abstract concepts and connect them to their earlier experiences. Especially during the earlier school years where the teachers seem to be more reluctant towards giving out a written grade.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2012. , 54 p.
Keyword [en]
Dialog, Self assessment, Peer assessment, Feedback
Keyword [sv]
Samtal, Självbedömning, Kamratbedömning, Feedback
National Category
Educational Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-18135OAI: oai:DiVA.org:sh-18135DiVA: diva2:600668
Subject / course
Education Studies
Uppsok
Social and Behavioural Science, Law
Supervisors
Available from: 2013-01-25 Created: 2013-01-25 Last updated: 2013-01-25Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(199 kB)584 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 199 kBChecksum SHA-512
2c8bc2f984c1ee4119c0817766ac4bfdc50b852793850ba77590d3e6f696d0ecc041c36bc8ad08f09e55c3c7b47b31e3594e76b83b2043c560d310af33efa28c
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Teacher Education
Educational Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 584 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 238 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf