Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Fatigue in Parkinson’s disease: measurement properties of a generic and a condition-specific rating scale
Department of Health Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Department of Health Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Kristianstad University, School of Health and Society, Avdelningen för Hälsovetenskap. Kristianstad University, Research Environment PRO-CARE.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2174-372X
2013 (English)In: Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, ISSN 0885-3924, E-ISSN 1873-6513, Vol. 46, no 5, 737-746 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Context: High quality fatigue rating scales are needed to advance understanding of fatigue nd determine the efficacy of interventions. Several fatigue scales are used in Parkinson’s isease, but few have been tested using modern psychometric methodology (Rasch analysis).

Objectives: To examine the measuring properties of the generic Functional Assessment of hronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-F) scale and the condition-specific 16-item arkinson Fatigue Scale (PFS-16) using Rasch analysis.

Methods: Postal survey data (n=150; 47% women; mean age, 70) were Rasch analyzed. FS-16 scores were tested according both to the original polytomous and the suggested lternative dichotomized scoring methods.

Results: The PFS-16 showed overall Rasch model fit whereas the FACIT-F showed signs of isfit, which probably was due to a sleepiness-related item and mixing of ositively/negatively worded items. There was no differential tem functioning by disease uration but by fatigue status (greater likelihood of needing to sleep or rest during the day mong people classified as non-fatigued) in the PFS-16 and FACIT-F. However, this did not mpact total score based estimated person measures. Targeting and reliability (≥0.86) was ood, but the dichotomized PFS-16 showed compromised measurement precision. olytomous and dichotomized PFS-16 and FACIT-F scores identified 6, 3 and 4 statistically istinct sample strata, respectively.

Conclusion: We found general support for the measurement properties of both scales. owever, polytomous PFS-16 scores exhibited advantages compared to dichotomous PFS-16 nd FACIT-F scores. Dichotomization of item responses compromises measurement recision and ability to separate people, and should be avoided.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2013. Vol. 46, no 5, 737-746 p.
Keyword [en]
Fatigue, Parkinson’s disease, Rasch model, rating scales, reliability, validity
National Category
Health Sciences
URN: urn:nbn:se:hkr:diva-10062DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2012.11.004ISI: 000326236900017PubMedID: 23507131OAI: diva2:600007
Available from: 2013-01-22 Created: 2013-01-22 Last updated: 2014-09-15Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(386 kB)427 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 386 kBChecksum SHA-512
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Hagell, Peter
By organisation
Avdelningen för HälsovetenskapResearch Environment PRO-CARE
In the same journal
Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 427 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 33 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link